Go back
TrustPilot reviews

TrustPilot reviews

General


If anyone has a TrustPilot account, and a few minutes to spare, could I ask that you leave a review there for RHP? Do your worst! (Well, be nice if possible πŸ˜‰ ). Thanks in advance.

RedHotPawn's TrustPilot

Vote Up
Vote Down

dear russ,

i realize that the website trustpilot.com is not yours to maintain
BUT
the only review i can see for rhp/dailychess is a five star yahoo!
which is weird because the site also reports that the average user experience is 3.7 star review

3.7 is not the average of 5

i decline to trust the trustpilot

Vote Up
Vote Down

@rookie54 said

3.7 is not the average of 5

i decline to trust the trustpilot
Some mathematics at play here that only a higher intelligence can understand.


@Russ

Done, Jack Sparrow.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@moonbus said
@Russ

Done, Jack Sparrow.
Thanks!

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Russ

It might not be online yet, there is a review period. (No profanity πŸ˜€ )

Vote Up
Vote Down

Will do.


@Drewnogal said
Will do.
Thank you.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Thanks again to those who posted a review. Good for casual TrustPilot browsers to read, and in addition I believe these sites might be quite important in future as search engines clearly will struggle in the age of mass AI content.

2 edits

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
From a web crawlers perspective (e.g. Google), when assessing what to index, a curated list of rated sites (so provably not spam) which humans have reviewed is a good starting point to add weight to an index. (All speculation by me.)

Back in the day when the web's size and form was more manageable, directories used to exist which would serve this purpose.


@rookie54 said
3.7 is not the average of 5
This mystery is solved - they initially use a "Bayesian average"

We use a Bayesian average in the calculation, to make sure that a business with fewer reviews starts off with a balanced TrustScore. This means that we automatically include the value of 7 reviews worth 3.5 stars each in all TrustScore calculations.


@Russ said
This mystery is solved - they initially use a "Bayesian average"

We use a Bayesian average in the calculation, to make sure that a business with fewer reviews starts off with a balanced TrustScore. This means that we automatically include the value of 7 reviews worth 3.5 stars each in all TrustScore calculations.
i read that when i was perusing the website
the older the review, the less weight it carries towards the average

this sort of thingie is beyond, above, and superior to my thought process

i bow to the gods of statistics

actually, sort of a half bow
i still don't trust easily

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Russ said
Thanks again to those who posted a review. Good for casual TrustPilot browsers to read, and in addition I believe these sites might be quite important in future as search engines clearly will struggle in the age of mass AI content.
Google is becoming unusable, tried to turn the AI feature off... Apparently that's not possible. The difference is search results now from even 10 years ago is staggering. Duckduckgo is a decent one but again not as good as they used to be. Think I originally found rhp with a Google (or other search engine), probably just shows chess.com now.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@A-Unique-Nickname said
Duckduckgo is a decent one but again not as good as they used to be. Think I originally found rhp with a Google (or other search engine), probably just shows chess.com now.
The degree to which chess dot com dominates search engine results is absolutely suffocating. Its virtually impossible to challenge them.

Hey, but their TrustPilot score isn't so great compared to that new shiny RHP rating! πŸ˜‰

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.