Originally posted by CribsAm not familiar with the topic of the first thread.
From the top 15 threads, I claim that none of these 6
are intended to be a debate.
Square peg, round hole.....
Most influential books
Women of rhp! Unite!!!!!
Game Shows
Question about religion
Philosophy Quotes
topics 2,3 and 5 do not belong in debates.
The religion thread does because from the topic it asks for discussion 9or debate).
Does Bible study week 1 ask for anything in the topic?
Feivel
1 edit
Originally posted by FeivelThe religion thread asks for neither debate nor discussion. It asks
Am not familiar with the topic of the first thread.
topics 2,3 and 5 do not belong in debates.
The religion thread does because from the topic it asks for discussion 9or debate).
Does Bible study week 1 ask for anything in the topic?
Feivel
that everybody lines up, speaks their creed, and then moves on
so that the next person can do the same.
The Bible Study does ask readers to complete some exercises,
presumably to be discussed as a group.
Dr. Cribs
2 edits
Originally posted by CribsThe problem lies with you use of presumably. I don't know your age group so I will use both the Odd Couple and The Bad News Bears to illustrate. You do know what they say about assumptions right? They make assume become ass u me 🙂
The religion thread asks for neither debate nor discussion. It asks
that everybody lines up, speaks their creed, and then moves on
so that the next person can do the same.
The Bible Study does ask readers to complete some exercises,
presbly umato be discussed as a group.
Dr. Cribs
Feivel
How did your quote get mispelled ?
1 edit
Originally posted by FeivelOk, perhaps I have a naive definition of what a Bible Study is.
The problem lies with you use of presumably. I don't know your age group so I will use both the Odd Couple and The Bad News Bears to illustrate. You do know what they say about assumptions right? They make assume become ass u me 🙂
Feivel
How did your quote get mispelled ?
But that still leaves several other threads that you admit don't
belong, but that you haven't spoken out against. This indicates
that you have a particular bias against RBHILL or Bible Studies.
Otherwise, you would have raised hell about all of the threads
that don't belong.
When you do this, you forfeit the right to say "Because they don't
belong" when you speak out against the Bible Studies.
Dr. Cribs
Originally posted by CribsWhy do refuse to see what I have been posting all morning? I have something against EVANGELISM in the forums or via PM. Should I say that again so maybe you'll see it?
Ok, perhaps I have a naive definition of what a Bible Study is.
But that still leaves several other threads that you admit don't
belong, but that you haven't spoken out against. This indicates
that you have a particular bias against RBHILL or Bible Studies.
Otherwise, you would have raised hell about all of the threads
that don't belong.
When you ...[text shortened]... say "Because they don't
belong" when you speak out against the Bible Studies.
Dr. Cribs
I have something against EVANGELISM in the forums or via PM.
I have something against EVANGELISM in the forums or via PM.
I have something against EVANGELISM in the forums or via PM.
Maybe there wouldn't be so much trash in the forums (at least from me) if some people would read my posts and respond with theior brains rather than responding while not reading and responding emotionally.
Feivel
Originally posted by CribsThis indicates
Ok, perhaps I have a naive definition of what a Bible Study is.
But that still leaves several other threads that you admit don't
belong, but that you haven't spoken out against. This indicates
that you have a particular bias against RBHILL or Bible Studies.
Otherwise, you would have raised hell about all of the threads
that don't belong.
When you ...[text shortened]... say "Because they don't
belong" when you speak out against the Bible Studies.
Dr. Cribs
that you have a particular bias against RBHILL or Bible Studies.
Ok...you narrowed it down to two possibilities so why do you assume that it must be that I am against Rob?
For the record I am not against bible studies, I am however against them being used to spam and as a method of EVANGIELISM in a forum that I paid to be a member of.
Feivel
2 edits
Originally posted by FeivelThat is clear. The problem is that it is essentially
Why do refuse to see what I have been posting all morning? I have something against EVANGELISM in the forums or via PM. Should I say that again so maybe you'll see it?
[b]I have something against EVANGELISM in the forums or via PM.
[b ...[text shortened]... onding while not reading and responding emotionally.
Feivel[/b][/b]
axiomatic to you, since you cannot back it up with
any reason why EVANGELISM should be banned.
All reasons that you have put forward fail to account
for why you don't have a problem with the other junk.
If you would just admit that it is an axiomatic opinion,
then we would be done. But you are trying to prove
that your opinion is right in order to make the community
also hold that same axiom and thereby ban the EVANGELISM.
I have also stated my opinion on the matter. The difference
is that I have backed it up with facts and observations that
EVERYBODY can agree on, even those who disagree with my
opinion.
Dr. Cribs
Originally posted by rapalla7Then why haven't you spoken out about the Philosopy Quotes thread?
Would a car dealership be able post in the forum about why the cars they are selling are better than the competions?
If it is selling or pushing any product it has no place in the forum.
That is pushing a product as much as the Bible Study thread is.
Originally posted by CribsDid you read this?
That is clear. The problem is that it is essentially
axiomatic to you, since you cannot back it up with
any reason why EVANGELISM should be banned.
All reasons that you have put forward fail to account
for why you don't have a problem with the other junk.
If you would just admit that it is an axiomatic opinion,
then we would be done. But you are try ...[text shortened]... bservations that
EVERYBODY can agree on, even those who disagree with my
opinion.
Dr. Cribs
For the record I am not against bible studies, I am however against them being used to spam and as a method of EVANGIELISM in a forum that I paid to be a member of.
What is wrong about that statement? What is wrong with my proposed solution of a forum for Religion and Philosophy? You paid for a subscription to this site and maybe you welcome evangelism. Ok go to the religion forum Russ hopefully creates. I paid the same subscription fee and i don't welcome evangelism, why should I be subject to it?
Feivel
Originally posted by FeivelYou have made it clear that your stance is axiomatic,
Did you read this?
[b]For the record I am not against bible studies, I am however against them being used to spam and as a method of EVANGIELISM in a forum that I paid to be a member of.
What is wrong about that statement? What is wrong with my proposed solution of a forum for Religion and Philosophy? You paid for a subscription to this site and may ...[text shortened]... same subscription fee and i don't welcome evangelism, why should I be subject to it?
Feivel[/b]
so I'm not going to debate with you on this matter anymore.
Dr. Cribs
Originally posted by CribsIf you prefer to ignore my statement,
You have made it clear that your stance is axiomatic,
so I'm not going to debate with you on this matter anymore.
Dr. Cribs
For the record I am not against bible studies, I am however against them being used to spam and as a method of EVANGIELISM in a forum that I paid to be a member of.
then by all means don't reply to me 🙂
Feivel