1 edit
Originally posted by josephwI'm saying it isn't true according to your definition, not mine.
If it ain't according to your definitions it ain't true. Perfect for denial.
The only "definition" of bullying that I think applies here is if someone filled his inbox with porn.
Grampy Bobby has never claimed to have been "bullied".
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFIF you were truthful with yourself, you'd know the answer to this.
Most of the "vicious, cruel and hateful comments leveled against GB over the years" were made by me? Are you sure?
But you're not truthful to anyone. You twist everything. You probably even do it to yourself to enable yourself to sleep at night.
BTW, enjoying your new job here?
Originally posted by SuzianneIf you will take a moment to read what I am saying: I am saying I don't get "bullied". Grampy Bobby doesn't get "bullied". Neither of us get "bullied". I thik josephw has got it all wrong. I don't claim to get "bullied". Grampy Bobby doesn't claim to get "bullied". Neither of us claim to get "bullied".
Still wondering why you get the disagreement you do (which you have tried (and failed) to call bullying )?
Originally posted by SuzianneHow have I twisted it? You said most of the "vicious, cruel and hateful comments leveled against GB over the years" - as mentioned by VR - were made by me. I haven't twisted what you said at all. Do you sincerely believe it's true?
You twist everything. You probably even do it to yourself to enable yourself to sleep at night.
Originally posted by FMFNo, because I am direct.
I am not trying to garner any support or concern whatsoever. I would have thought that was crystal clear from what I have been saying.
Tell me, do you think I talk to Grampy Bobby in a way that is comparable to the way you talk to me? 😉
You are evasive and indirect in your conflicts. All because you wish to straddle both sides of the street and to appear to not be doing exactly what you're doing in conversation.
Originally posted by FMFYeah, right.
If you will take a moment to read what I am saying: I am saying I don't get "bullied". Grampy Bobby doesn't get "bullied". Neither of us get "bullied". I thik josephw has got it all wrong. I don't claim to get "bullied". Grampy Bobby doesn't claim to get "bullied". Neither of us claim to get "bullied".
Just like "All lives matter."
Originally posted by SuzianneI may be a lot of things, Suzianne but 'NOT DIRECT' is not one of them. I am probably one of the most forthright and you-know-exactly-what-I-think posters among the regulars.
No, because I am direct.
You are evasive and indirect in your conflicts..
Originally posted by FMFAnd you SAY this precisely BECAUSE you are not. Because you want to appear to be something you're not. In fact, that's probably how you got your new job, some naive person brought into your lies. So stand proud, you now have something else in common with Robbie Carrobie.
I may be a lot of things, Suzianne but 'NOT DIRECT' is not one of them. I am probably one of the most forthright and you-know-exactly-what-I-think posters among the regulars.