What is a “true” atheist?

-Removed-

No, I'm talking to you.

Are you hearing voices again?

@suzianne said
Romans had more of an influence on you than we thought.

On whose behalf are you talking? You suggesting that everybody agrees with your banter against divegeester - in this case mentioning Romans1009 - is surely "gaslighting" in the way you mean it? We shall see if Relentless Red will call you out for it.

@kevin-eleven said
Are you about to die, or are you overthinking things?

wishfull thinking on my part.as for god if he exists then I despise him.

@fmf said
On whose behalf are you talking? You suggesting that everybody agrees with your banter against divegeester - in this case mentioning Romans1009 - is surely "gaslighting" in the way you mean it? We shall see if Relentless Red will call you out for it.

Because it's not gaslighting. Jeeeeez, you are dim.

-Removed-

"Weeds"?

It might help if you spoke a bit more plainly (you know, without all the vocabulary car crashes).

We. Everyone. I assume you are familiar with English, you know, what with you being English and all?

-Removed-

gaslighting

-Removed-

Not if they're dim.

Damn, would you catch up, please?

I'd love to have a conversation where I didn't have to continually explain everything.

-Removed-

I haven't sent any PMs for days now.

You could try knowing what you're talking about before assuming the most laughable stuff.

You do know your continued posting in this fashion only hurts your ludicrous case, yes?

@fmf said
On whose behalf are you talking? You suggesting that everybody agrees with your banter against divegeester - in this case mentioning Romans1009 - is surely "gaslighting" in the way you mean it? We shall see if Relentless Red will call you out for it.

Everyone has become aware of what your posting style represents.

Most people would probably lay low for awhile to take the heat off.

But go ahead, double down. You're only proving what I've been saying for pages now.