What is qualified psychiatry?

-Removed-

Keep it up, chuckles.

You may exceed Rusty's red thumb record.

-Removed-

Without forum principle or integrity?

That is a laugh. YOU are the one saying right here that it was in reply to FMF when everyone can see that it was not, and therefore you are lying, and rather blatantly at that. Gaslighting at its most obvious, yet you continue doing it.

Yeah, dim.

-Removed-

Why on earth would you think that I post like you?

Did I not say the post was simply "more on this later"? More about domestic, emotional abuse.

Why are you so slow today? Maybe it's you who needs the vacation.

@suzianne said
Did I not say the post was simply "more on this later"? More about domestic, emotional abuse.

Yes. And you also said" "I will leave it to the reader to figure out how all this could apply in an online micro-environment like RHP."

It was a follow-on from a post where you suggested - in agreement with Relentless Red - that my posting was akin to the communication found in abusive domestic relationships.

You quoted Psychology Today. And now on another thread, where I said something you didn't like, you suggested I "need professional help".

@fmf said
Yes. And you also said" "I will leave it to the reader to figure out how all this could apply in an online micro-environment like RHP."

It was a follow-on from a post where you suggested - in agreement with Relentless Red - that my posting was akin to the communication found in abusive domestic relationships.

You quoted Psychology Today. And now on another thread, where I said something you didn't like, you suggested I "need professional help".

I'll leave it to the reader to figure out why this is wrong and represents pure waffle... without chicken.

Hint 1: You keep saying "my posting".

Hint 2: No comment was made about your posts specifically. Use more rosin, you're losing your grip.

I happen to think you're attempting to cover for someone else. someone who WAS targeted for metal health issues.

Your tie is far too wide. Entertain us by attempting to prognosticate on what that means. I mean, since you're already all in about bad guesses.

@suzianne said
I'll leave it to the reader to figure out why this is wrong and represents pure waffle... without chicken.

Good. Page 3 and 5 of the "Gaslighting" thread.

@suzianne said
I happen to think you're attempting to cover for someone else. someone who WAS targeted for metal health issues.

I happen to think you're attempting to cover for someone else. someone who WAS targeted for mental health issues.

Who is being "targeted for mental health issues"?

-Removed-

So that's a no on the vacation?

@fmf said
Good. Page 3 and 5 of the "Gaslighting" thread.

I already proved that nonsense wrong. Since you're backtracking go back where I disproved that waffle. And it is pages 5 and 6. Losing track?