Originally posted by SeitseOK, I'm back with you now - the last comment was in an alert not a PM, which is why I couldn't find it.
gee, hangovers are sacred. go survive it and we keep it up later on.
Yeah, I meant the second one, after that, where I alterted to you
another antisemitic thread from the same person
I've got to get my head together now and go to London for a lunch meeting. If I haven't got back to you by the end of tomorrow PM me?
Originally posted by SJ247And I'm guessing you got Phlab's permission to post the contents of a PRIVATE MESSAGE?
Wow.
I think it may have possibly been phlabibit.
Basing this on pm's quoting RN, quoting Phlabibit, saying "Enjoy you're time off. -P"
Just a guess though.
I think its time for a name change from the donkeys, to something like H|U|M|O|U|R|L|E|S|S P|A|R|A|N|O|I|D D|R|A|M|A Q|U|E|E|N|S
D
Originally posted by belgianfreakno probs, mate, as i said hangovers are sacred and our life even more. when you have some spare time we'll keep exchanging impressions
OK, I'm back with you now - the last comment was in an alert not a PM, which is why I couldn't find it.
I've got to get my head together now and go to London for a lunch meeting. If I haven't got back to you by the end of tomorrow PM me?
yeah, you are right, the last one was an alert, lol
😕
Originally posted by 7ate9Um, why do you think he should apologize? He really believes what he said, based on what he's read. He wasn't just tossing out angry words. If he was just babbling in anger, it'd be different.
i came into that thread and read up to a point on the second page where i thought i would give stocken some encouragement for the thread he started. nobody seemed to believe he was being genuine, so maybe i was naive to think he was.
i posted and then checked back over the previous few posts and was surprised to see what was going on. maybe i missed some o ...[text shortened]... forums where he said what he did. that's why i nutted at him or whoever else wanted a piece.
Originally posted by reader1107Even if he believes it, it's only an assumption, and stating it as a fact is not okay. And he knew very well that he was going too far. On the other hand, Red Night doesn't seem very good at apologizing either. I also don't see why an apology should be in public.
Um, why do you think he should apologize? He really believes what he said, based on what he's read. He wasn't just tossing out angry words. If he was just babbling in anger, it'd be different.
Originally posted by 7ate9So it's alright for Red Night to make assumptions about people, calling them racist, attacking them etc., and he has no reason to apologize for it, but if RookRAK is making an assumption about Red Night, he should apologize in public?
because that was where the accusations were made.
i wouldn't apologise if i was rednight either, just like i ain't gonna apologise for saying "yeah, that's right. you idiots run."
1 edit
Originally posted by 7ate9People didn't target Red Night for nothing. If you keep provoking people, you shouldn't be surprised when you are targeted (and I don't think he was surprised, I rather think he reached his goal). He has also made some completely unprovoked attacks himself. He's not the poor weak victim you want him to make.
i don't see all things, but part of what i first said when i read what i did was about how lots of people were targeting rednight and making him weak. so it's reasonable to look at some things as a proportional fraction of where a person reaches their limits. that's something i said to rednight when he first started taking part on his mission in the forums... e when they are weak to cause them to flip out and then point my own dirty finger at them.
Edit: They both got a ban, RookRAK a longer one, which I'd say is justified, they both know why they were banned, and they both don't complain about it. I'd say let it rest.
1 edit
I would like to clarify a few things.First,this thread's intent was to poke fun at the other,"Who Banned So and So?" threads.I think that question in itself is not the world's most intelligent question to begin with.Of course it was a moderator or administrator that banned the players.And knowing that the admins.are not known to mod.in the forums.The whole question is retorical.
It was not my intent to stir up fights or controversy.This thread was intended to be a joke.Then Red sent me a PM,and to me it sounded like he was taking his lumps like a big boy,and held himself accountable for his actions,and didn't blame the mods for banning him. I asked for permission frpm Red to post the PM,Red agreed.
I am truly sorry for causing problems.or any extra work or trouble for anyone involved. 😞
Originally posted by aspviper666Yeah... to quote Red Night:
I would like to clarify a few things.First,this thread's intent was to poke fun at the other,"Who Banned So and So?" threads.I think that question in itself is not the world's most intelligent question to begin with.Of course it was a moderator or administrator that banned the players.And knowing that the admins.are not known to mod.in the forums.The who ...[text shortened]... I am truly sorry for causing problems.or any extra work or trouble for anyone involved. 😞
"People who post negative things about others have low self esteem".