@suzianne saidSusan,
Will Smith was within his rights to defend his wife, who has a scalp condition. Chris Rock attacked her for having a medical condition. But you're all about that, aren't you? You have done the same thing here yourself.
I'm on Will's side. But you can sit back in your leather chair implying he has a drug problem.
What is wrong with you?
BTW, I would have hit hi ...[text shortened]... eep my wife's name out of your f---ing mouth!" He said it twice. His motivation was crystal clear.
If Will had used his fist instead of an open hand, it would have been a total disaster and ruined the evening for all, not least himself. What he did was a bit chevaleresque and did no harm really.
@torunn saidI think the word "chivalry" puts too much of a positive spin on it, but I do understand where you are coming from!
What he did was a bit chevaleresque and did no harm really.
There is always some degree of "harm" when role models and people in the public eye make bad decisions, I think.
But I agree that Smith "did no harm really" to Chris Rock.
Smith would have "damaged" Rock more if he had just stood up and called Rock out for his shabby attempt at a joke.
Smith's wife would have been better served by a chivalrous husband who remained on the moral high ground.
@fmf saidChris Rock's bad joke was, I believe, in his script and was meant to be what it was. Will Smith's reaction was impulsive. Still they were both unprofessional.
I think the word "chivalry" puts too much of a positive spin on it, but I do understand where you are coming from!
There is always some degree of "harm" when role models and people in the public eye make bad decisions, I think.
But I agree that Smith "did no harm really" to Chris Rock.
Smith would have "damaged" Rock more if he had just stood up and called Rock out fo ...[text shortened]... 's wife would have been better served by a chivalrous husband who remained on the moral high ground.