Originally posted by divegeester Josephw made an attempt earlier in this thread, to explain what he thought you meant, was he correct? You seem reluctant to discuss this.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby Originally posted by Grampy Bobby (OP)
[b]Your Assessment of Red Hot Pawn
"Red Hot Pawn" (By Edward Scimia, Chess Expert)
"Red Hot Pawn (and several other sites that offer the same service with a slightly different look and feel, such as Play The Immortal Game) is a turn-based correspondence chess site with more than 100,000 members. ...[text shortened]... benefit from the most and/or least? 3) Other objectively focused and relevant comments? Thanks,"[/b]
RHP is a quirky site. It's an oddball amongst its competition - obviously coded by a guy who is not a serious chess player, yet has sufficient dedication to the concept of a chess website to keep it going for years and years, developing a respectable user base.
Originally posted by BigDoggProblem RHP is a quirky site. It's an oddball amongst its competition - obviously coded by a guy who is not a serious chess player, yet has sufficient dedication to the concept of a chess website to keep it going for years and years, developing a respectable user base.
Thanks for your candor and honesty. Which competitive online correspondence chess sites with public and private clan and club forums
represent the most significant challenge to Red Hot Pawn's present market share during the next five years?
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby [b]Thanks for your candor and honesty.
I'm just curious; you frequently prefix your posts with these ingratiating platitudes. It makes me wonder if you are seeing something new in terms of candid honesty from BDP or wether you just find his posts a refreshing change from the dishonestly and guile of the preceding posters?
Originally posted by divegeester I'm just curious; you frequently prefix your posts with these ingratiating platitudes. It makes me wonder if you are seeing something new in terms of candid honesty from BDP or wether you just find his posts a refreshing change from the dishonestly and guile of the preceding posters?
Is your reluctance to engage in any meaningful discourse in any of these forums, and your preference to dodge, deflect, copy/paste or just post trite like this, a deliberate pose by you, or are you just scared of being found out to be lacking in any real substantiate conviction whatsoever?
Your Assessment of Red Hot Pawn
21 Mar '16 15:19
Back to Top