Just look at my games. For example Game 2248294
With a win like that I must be at least 2800, maybe 3800 what do you think?
Originally posted by Dragon FireWOW, you sure showed him!
Just look at my games. For example Game 2248294
With a win like that I must be at least 2800, maybe 3800 what do you think?
Originally posted by Dragon FireIs it you dragon fire? I did not think you would show your face after the cheating accusations baloney. Now you have managed to beat someone ranked nearly 1000 points below you in 2 moves. Is that the highly ranked fellow you were talking about?
Just look at my games. For example Game 2248294
With a win like that I must be at least 2800, maybe 3800 what do you think?
Originally posted by z00tLets not forget the cheating accusations Thread 52830 which is clearly baloney to you but which raised an important issue and which clarified in my mind, thanks to people like you, the justification of the reservations that some genuinely strong players seem to have.
Is it you dragon fire? I did not think you would show your face after the cheating accusations baloney. Now you have managed to beat someone ranked nearly 1000 points below you in 2 moves. Is that the highly ranked fellow you were talking about?
This game is actually fairly old and if you don't know who Nybble is I am sure someone will enlighten you.
It seems to me z00t that you are another one of those posters who has nothing constructive to say and likes knocking everyone.
Originally posted by Dragon FireI do not "knock everyone down". If you read the technical aspects of my comments they are perfectly valid. I would have been happy to leave the "cheating accusations" baloney alone, had it not been for the very wild 9 out of 10 claim.
Lets not forget the cheating accusations Thread 52830 which is clearly baloney to you but which raised an important issue and which clarified in my mind, thanks to people like you, the justification of the reservations that some genuinely strong players seem to have.
It seems to me z00t that you are another one of those posters who has nothing constructive to say and likes knocking everyone.
As an example in the sicilian thread some guy called son of sam or the other makes some mis-statements :-
- 1) No opening gives an automatic advantage .....
- 2) Most of my wins are due to poor middlegame play....
- 3) What in the hell does "let him repeat moves" mean?
This either demonstrates a complete disregard of chess theory or a lack of understanding of some aspects of it. Should this go un-challenged?
Originally posted by Dragon FireLet me beat you and decrease you elo below the 1800s
Just look at my games. For example Game 2248294
With a win like that I must be at least 2800, maybe 3800 what do you think?
Originally posted by z00tYou jackass. Why don't you make your comments in the appropriate thread? There is no opening that gives an automatic win. If there was, the entire game of chess would be dead and done and everyone would play that opening and always win--an extended version of tic-tac-toe, nothing less. And most of my wins are due to poor middlegame play by my opponents, as I readily admit that I am not good enough to win by positional play. I just can't hold that much crap in my head at once. When my opponent makes a mistake, I pounce. I'd hazzard a guess that most people play this way. And finally, as for "let him repeat moves," the comment of yours was vague and insubstantial, and refered to one time in the game in question where I tested my opponent by repeating a set of moves once. I'm certain that even you could find grandmaster games where moves are repeated. It takes three repeated positions to cause a draw, so go crawl back under your rock and take a nap.
I do not "knock everyone down". If you read the technical aspects of my comments they are perfectly valid. I would have been happy to leave the "cheating accusations" baloney alone, had it not been for the very wild 9 out of 10 claim.
As an example in the sicilian thread some guy called son of sam or the other makes some mis-statements :-
- 1) No opening ...[text shortened]... ess theory or a lack of understanding of some aspects of it. Should this go un-challenged?
Oh yeah, your deliberate misrepresenting of my name only shows what kind of person you are, interested only in insulting people and attempting to over-inflate your own intelligence and importance. Go away and learn how to communicate before you start pretending that you know everyting.
1 edit
Originally posted by son of samYou know I could not resist (with a nick like that). How about a game of tic-tac-toe?
You jackass......
I did tell you what I have stated above in the relevant thread. You cannot illustrate a "good opening" with an irrelevant game? Who plays the Marshall because white may blunder at move 30?
Originally posted by z00tDoesn't this apply to every opening. With best play (rare even at GM level, let alone ours) you should end up equal, which is what most of us hope for. It is then usually an error in the middle game that decides things, especially here where databases and books can be used.
You know I could not resist (with a nick like that). How about a game of tic-tac-toe?
I did tell you what I have stated above in the relevant thread. You cannot illustrate a "good opening" with an irrelevant game? Who plays the Marshall because white may blunder at move 30?