15 Dec '06 10:30>
Whilst I can appreciate that something had to be done about the losers that deliberately reduce their rating to enter banded tourni's I have to say that the new system is using a sledgehammer to crack a nut!!!
Using this method i'm now restricted to tourni's over 1701. I hit this high for 1 day after two timeouts in the clan league v a player rated 2000+.
I may get above 1700 again but I have to say that my record (currently) against players this high is poor.
It seems that fair players are being punished for the actions of a few losers. Surely a fairer method can be implimented.
I would suggest rolling average over 6 months and couple this with a max rating minus 5% figure. The tournament entry criteria is whichever is the higher.
Thus those who go on a long break would come back and their tourni limit is still max - 10%. It would also smooth out rating spikes and would mean that the 'resign games to get in low banded tourni' players could no longer do so.
If this is too complicated then max - 5% would seem fairer as this would also smooth out rating spikes and stop the losers as well.
Thank you
Using this method i'm now restricted to tourni's over 1701. I hit this high for 1 day after two timeouts in the clan league v a player rated 2000+.
I may get above 1700 again but I have to say that my record (currently) against players this high is poor.
It seems that fair players are being punished for the actions of a few losers. Surely a fairer method can be implimented.
I would suggest rolling average over 6 months and couple this with a max rating minus 5% figure. The tournament entry criteria is whichever is the higher.
Thus those who go on a long break would come back and their tourni limit is still max - 10%. It would also smooth out rating spikes and would mean that the 'resign games to get in low banded tourni' players could no longer do so.
If this is too complicated then max - 5% would seem fairer as this would also smooth out rating spikes and stop the losers as well.
Thank you