Originally posted by EcstremeVenom so it is no good?
I would say so.
White can play 3.Nc3 (instead of 3.f3), which is better, but anyway after 3....e5! or even 3...Nf6 black haven`t enough compensation for equality.
Originally posted by EcstremeVenom i like this line as white, do you think it is good or bad? here is a link with some examples idk the name of it though
aren't you supposed to do this to the other side of the board with:
1. e4 e5
2. d4 exd4
3. c3 dxc3
4. Bc4 cxb2
5. Bxb2
that's how i thought it was supposed to go...
of course there is no way on earth that black can stand a chance holding on to both pawns in this line...
it's just impossible...
Originally posted by Korch I would say so.
White can play 3.Nc3 (instead of 3.f3), which is better, but anyway after 3....e5! or even 3...Nf6 black haven`t enough compensation for equality.
I meant that after 3...e5 and 3...Nf6 its white who haven`t enough compensation for the pawn.