Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
Against 1. e4 I used to play the Sicilian, but I started believing the Sicilian is better suited for advanced players.
I'm really starting to like the French defense and all I've done is watch a few short videos talking about different lines. It's already been playable for me because the "right" moves tend to be more natural and intuitive. More ...[text shortened]... ns?
Also, any comments about my assessment of the lines I've been playing?
This might be a copout reply, but I think you can play anything you want.
I would recommend playing through a large number of Master games, and note the games where black plays against 1. d4, and the defense makes sense or otherwise appeals to you.
Every defense has thematic ideas and also long variations played at the GM level. I think the best idea is to play one that appeals to you on an intuitive level- the moves will make sense to you, they will be easier to find, and you will feel more comfortable and have more fun.
Since you can refer to books here, long variations are not a threat, and playing here will help you learn them for when you play OTB.
If you play an opening long enough, you gradually learn long variations almost by default, as each new game prompts memories of previous games- how they went, what you learned, what you would change, etc.
When I started, I played the King's Indian Defense. There were a large number of variations, but many of the ideas were thematic, so I had very similar plans in each variation. In addition, my first 5 (and sometimes 6 or 7) moves were almost always the same, so it was easy to learn deeper lines since the variations started after move 5.
In short, I think you can play whatever you want and be successful, if you stick with it and learn from your own experiences.
Paul