had that been 1-2min bullet game, then I would say it was cool and you played very well. but its a CC game, which makes you a pathetic loser who just tries to get some attention.
Originally posted by Jusuh had that been 1-2min bullet game, then I would say it was cool and you played very well. but its a CC game, which makes you a pathetic loser who just tries to get some attention.
You're just jealous that your own play isn't as scintillating as mine and that my rating must appear Olympian compared to your puny one.
Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter You're just jealous that your own play isn't as scintillating as mine and that my rating must appear Olympian compared to your puny one.
LOL you remind me of Hans and Franz from the old snl skit
Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter I probably would have tried the following: 20. bxc5 Bxc5 21. c4 e4 22. dxe4 Bxe4, with a very strong attack by Black.
idk..i think white would be fine 20.bxc5 Bxc5 21.cxd4...black has attacking chances but so does white thanks to blacks weak queen side...be interesting to say the least
Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter You're just jealous that your own play isn't as scintillating as mine and that my rating must appear Olympian compared to your puny one.
my rhp rating has nothing to do with my actual strength.
the point was that you made one cool-looking yet very typical sac. It didn't require lot of calculation to see you get at least great attacking chances for your knight. I would have seen it (and played it) in a bullet game. It was the most natural move to consider, nothing special.
Am I the new Tal?
06 Apr '07 10:58
Back to Top