04 Jan '07 05:02>
Why would someone stay in a game with a Rook, Two pawns, & King of course....Against a Rook, Knight, + Five Pawns & king? With no chances of promoting a pawn??...Perhaps someone can explain it ?
Originally posted by Very RustyHe might think your rating will rise shortly, so if he stays in the game he'll lose fewer points when he finally resigns.
Why would someone stay in a game with a Rook, Two pawns, & King of course....Against a Rook, Knight, + Five Pawns & king? With no chances of promoting a pawn??...Perhaps someone can explain it ?
Originally posted by Very RustySome people do this to manipulate their rating.
Why would someone stay in a game with a Rook, Two pawns, & King of course....Against a Rook, Knight, + Five Pawns & king? With no chances of promoting a pawn??...Perhaps someone can explain it ?
Originally posted by spud2048Yes, I see what you mean and thank you also !
Some people do this to manipulate their rating.
For example, lets say your playing someone who's 200 points below you and you end up in a position you really can't win from.
Some people decide to play as slow as they can from this lost position, hoping their oponents rating will continue to rise, so that when they eventually decide to quit they will l ...[text shortened]... game because you will have completed more games at the end (if you see what I mean).
Spud.
Originally posted by Very RustyYes it can backfire.
Actually that could backfire, if I happen to lose a few games, is going to put me closer to his/her rating , therefore, more points instead of less 😀
Originally posted by spud2048Exactly this happened once for me.
For example, lets say your playing someone who's 200 points below you and you end up in a position you really can't win from.
Some people decide to play as slow as they can from this lost position, hoping their oponents rating will continue to rise, so that when they eventually decide to quit they will lose less points because their opponent has gained potentially many points during the stalling.
Originally posted by FabianFnasMaybe I would do this also, but I would not go so far to wait until the last possible hour. And I also wouldn't want to hold up a tournament round by playing slow.
Exactly this happened once for me.
I entered a tournament and one of the members in my group had 1250 points. He had a quick win with on of the others so I looked into this game and a few others that he had won. I found out that he was playing really good and was worth a rating far higher than this. I would eventually lose, of that I was sure.
I de ...[text shortened]... game. Sometimes is not just about a few rating points.
…and there are other reasons as well.
Originally posted by adjeYou right but......
Maybe I would do this also, but I would not go so far to wait until the last possible hour. And I also wouldn't want to hold up a tournament round by playing slow.
Adje
Originally posted by adjeNo, exactly, neither did I.
Maybe I would do this also, but I would not go so far to wait until the last possible hour. And I also wouldn't want to hold up a tournament round by playing slow.
Adje