07 Dec '10 05:18>
Just wanted to add that the game of chess by tarrasch is NOT a beginners book-although if you were to get it it would be best to take the opening section with a a grain of salt
Originally posted by erikido
Just wanted to add that the game of chess by tarrasch is NOT a beginners book-although if you were to get it it would be best to take the opening section with a a grain of salt
Opening Theory has of course improved since the days of Tarrasch. Still, I think whatever Tarrasch suggests, it is playable for most of us.
Originally posted by toeternitoeThat would be Bronstein's book? Euwe also wrote a book on that tournament, but I have read neither it nor a review of it. Anyone?
Zürich 1953
Originally posted by pdunneYes,Bronstein's.I was not aware of the fact Euwe wrote about Zürich 1953 as well.
That would be Bronstein's book? Euwe also wrote a book on that tournament, but I have read neither it nor a review of it. Anyone?
I am currently reading Tarrasch's book of Nürnberg 1896, which is something of a forgotten gem. I've got the BCM reprint of the original German edition -- it was never translated into English. Some great games (and some real ...[text shortened]... 's criticism was harsh but fair." (Nr.60 Janowski - Showalter, Petroff Defence, 0-1 in 65)
Originally posted by greenpawn34Strange to recommend books about tal's games without mentionning the books he wrote !
Best games collections and Tournament books are the only books
I have really enjoyed.
Zurish 1953 - Bronstein? in 1993 Bronstein said;
"Most of the nice words and elegant expressions in the book overall are the work
of Vainstein, who writes very well… Of course the analysis and technical concepts
are mine, as are the views on my rivals, but I enjoyed doing it too.
Tartakowers best games by Tartakower. Same reason as above.