Go back
Calling Chess Guru Greenpawn34

Calling Chess Guru Greenpawn34

Only Chess


Originally posted by tomtom232
[pgn]
[FEN "rn4k1/ppp2pbp/6p1/4p3/1PP1nP2/3rP3/P2PK3/RN3N1q b - - 0 1"]
1. Nc6 a3 2. Nd4+ Kxd3 3. Nf2+ Kc3 4. Nd1+ Kd3 5. e4#[/pgn]

[pgn]
[FEN "rn4k1/ppp2pbp/6p1/4p3/1PP1nP2/3rP3/P2PK3/RN3N1q b - - 0 1"]
1. Nc6 a3 2. Nd4+ exd4 3. Qf3+ Ke1 4. Nf2 Nc3 5. Rxd2 Nxd2 6. Nd3[/pgn]


SOLV'D
Well your first variation works, but in the second one White could play different, like this:

4 edits

Originally posted by tomtom232
[pgn]
[FEN "rn4k1/ppp2pbp/6p1/4p3/1PP1nP2/3rP3/P2PK3/RN3N1q b - - 0 1"]
1. Nc6 a3 2. Nd4+ exd4 3. Qf3+ Ke1 4. Nf2 Nh2[/pgn]

Dangit
Oh I see now, the King is trapped after his third move. All we need is a piece to deliver check and that is a job for the bishop like so:



But these are mates in 5, so there must be something White can do to delay it another move. It looks like a3 was not as good as I though it was. Good job.

4 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

That delay can be done by Ng3 like so...



The delay could also be done by a move of any other piece or pawn by White on the 4th move and the bishop checking as in the previous example and then mating by taking the knight when it blocks the check.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Got it finally!


Originally posted by RJHinds
So is the trick solution that greenpawn34 gives below what you meant?

[pgn]
[FEN "rn4k1/ppp2pbp/6p1/4p3/1PP1nP2/3rP3/P2PK3/RN3N1q b - - 0 1"]
1. Nc6 Kxd3 {because your clue means White MUST take the rook sac} 2. Nxb4+ Ke2 3. Qh5+ Ke1 4. Nd3+ {This is checkmate in 6 moves because you are doing some funny counting with 4 moves for Black plus 3 moves for W ...[text shortened]... s on solving this puzzle until I get clarification from Exuma as to what the heck he means. 😏
You're a real dip-stick. Do you know this?

First, you prompt a response from GP...

Second, he responds, in kind.

And then you have not only the audacity to question, but go on to moan about petty descriptions.

Your body is a tool, your mind is a tool, and your usage of technology to rank where you stand, without one iota about the game of chess, completes the biggest tool of them all.

Fourth, send over a game. I wanna play vs your tool, as you have in-game conversation with me about strategies implemented/potential developments/referenced games/so forth, which I can then post here, after you ahve anihilated me!

-m.


hahaha what a tool


Poor RJ has posted 26 solutions to this problem over two threads.
(he has fallen into aTroll Trap.)

I wonder if we can get Exuma to show us the whole game and
see what else he can find.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mikelom
You're a real dip-stick. Do you know this?

First, you prompt a response from GP...

Second, he responds, in kind.

And then you have not only the audacity to question, but go on to moan about petty descriptions.

Your body is a tool, your mind is a tool, and your usage of technology to rank where you stand, without one iota about the game of chess, ...[text shortened]... nts/referenced games/so forth, which I can then post here, after you ahve anihilated me!

-m.
Are you that same dumbasses that post nonsense on the Spirituality Forum sometimes? It sounds like you are still out to lunch.


Originally posted by greenpawn34
Poor RJ has posted 26 solutions to this problem over two threads.
(he has fallen into aTroll Trap.)

I wonder if we can get Exuma to show us the whole game and
see what else he can find.
The solution you post don't make any sense. Your arthmetic sucks, too.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by greenpawn34
Poor RJ has posted 26 solutions to this problem over two threads.
(he has fallen into aTroll Trap.)

I wonder if we can get Exuma to show us the whole game and
see what else he can find.
Worth repeating.


Originally posted by RJHinds
Are you that same [b]dumbasses that post nonsense on the Spirituality Forum sometimes? It sounds like you are still out to lunch.[/b]
I'm just 'ONE' dumbass, not a multiplex of them!

-m. 😛


RJ, were you really asking for help from GP, or do you have a massive inferiority complex about someone who seems to have a lower grade than you but knows 100 times more about chess?

1 edit

Originally posted by morgski
RJ, were you really asking for help from GP, or do you have a massive inferiority complex about someone who seems to have a lower grade than you but knows 100 times more about chess?
RJHinds should be in psychiatric hospital instead of RHP forums. Russ should help & ban him from RHP.


Originally posted by mikelom
I'm just 'ONE' dumbass, not a multiplex of them!

-m. 😛
I thought you had to be a legion of them, like Jesus cast out of that wild man into the pigs. 😏


No ban. It will be sad day if he goes, he sometimes supplies some mild relief.
Also it would appear he has been bullied off the site. (and he will come back).

We just have to put up with him. He has a compulsive disorder to post in every
thread. (and to use the word psychological )
His post in the Ketch's thread '2012 chesscafe.com book of the year'
is a prime example.

The lads were talking about books and the thread was ticking over nicely.
He had to say something, he had to get in there. So we got.

"I have not read any of them."

Which adds nothing at all to the conversation but at least that thread
has been ticked off. It has been RJ'd.

I tend to ignore him unless I'm bored or he has left the ball rolling across
the goal line waiting for someone to tap it in.

Exuma posted a mate in 6. Four minutes later he added it's impossible. (ha ha ha).
So I reckon he has just discovered a hole. This happens, we all do things like this.
I ignored it till RJ in this new thread asked me to help.
So joining in on the fun I gave my 'creative' solution.

(it might be sound. I think SG will testify that sometimes when he posts a problem,
say a mate in 4, some of the lads on here think it's two moves for White and two
for Black. Though in Exuma's case I think not.)

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.