9 edits
Originally posted by ChessNetworkI guess your stages of reasoning were something like this:
In match play, who wins?
Cast your vote!
My vote: Nakamura
~Jerry~
http://www.youtube.com/user/ChessNetwork
Question: Who would beat, Carlsen or Nakamura?
Answer:
1)I'm American. Now this is very important.
2)Carlsen is Norwegian. Pass
3)Nakamura is American. Bingo!
4)American good.
5)Therefore Namakura good.
=Nakamura wins.
(This should also explain why Morphy is the best player to have ever lived according to some people.)
Instead, the stages should've been something like this:
1)Carlsen is WAY MUCH STRONGER than Nakamura.
=Carlsen wins.
Now that was easy 🙂
Originally posted by philidor positionPeople think Morphy was the one of the best because he destroyed pretty much everyone he played. 😛
I guess your stages of reasoning were something like this:
Question: Who would beat, Carlsen or Nakamura?
Answer:
1)I'm American. Now this is very important.
2)Carlsen is Norwegian. Pass
3)Nakamura is American. Bingo!
4)American good.
5)Therefore Namakura good.
=Nakamura wins.
(This should also explain why Morphy is the best p ...[text shortened]... s:
1)Carlsen is WAY MUCH STRONGER than Nakamura.
=Carlsen wins.
Now that was easy 🙂
Carlsen would win. Nakamura is good but Carlsen is really good.