Can you castle queenside if your rook passes through an attacked square?
I didn't think this was allowed but it's just happened against me?
Sorry if I seem thick but its been a long long time since I last played!!
The Korchnoi story. Originally posted by DawgHaus on the 26th June 2009
In the 21st game of the 1974 Karpov-Korchnoi match,
Karpov's 17th move Bxd5 attacked Korchnoi's R on h1.
If he moved the Rook that allowed Nf3+ winning the Q
(as would recapturing the B).
Korchnoi asked the arbiter if it was legal to castle with the Rook
under attack. It was, and he won quickly with 18.O-O!
Originally posted by greenpawn34 [b]The Korchnoi story. Originally posted by DawgHaus on the 26th June 2009
In the 21st game of the 1974 Karpov-Korchnoi match,
Karpov's 17th move Bxd5 attacked Korchnoi's R on h1.
If he moved the Rook that allowed Nf3+ winning the Q
(as would recapturing the B).
Korchnoi asked the arbiter if it was legal to castle with the Rook ...[text shortened]... 16. Bxg5 Qxg5 17. Qxg5 Bxd5 18. O-O Bxc4 19. f4 1-0 [/pgn]
The End[/b]
I was going to refer to this, but I could tell early on in the thread that I was already late to the party!
Folks who are still bewildered I recommend looking up the rules by yourself on Fide`s own site its in handbook under miscellaneous which is ridiculous to consider the laws of chess miscellaneous but that is where the rules can be found.Believe what humans say at your own risk.