1. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    26 Jan '08 14:59
    Originally posted by adam warlock
    I'm looking into 1. Rxg6+ but let me see.
    I don't see any mate unless black helps but I can always get material.
  2. Standard memberRagnorak
    For RHP addons...
    tinyurl.com/yssp6g
    Joined
    16 Mar '04
    Moves
    15013
    26 Jan '08 15:051 edit
    Originally posted by adam warlock
    I don't see any mate unless black helps but I can always get material.
    "Winning line".

    Polgar gives a mating line in the text, but she doesn't consider 3...Kf7, whereby a rook is lost and the bishop can be exchanged for a rook, removing the mate thread and giving a won endgame for white.

    Polgar gives... 1. Rxg6+ Kh8 2. Rxh6+ Kg7 3. Rg6+ Kh8 4. Qh5#

    D
  3. Standard memberRagnorak
    For RHP addons...
    tinyurl.com/yssp6g
    Joined
    16 Mar '04
    Moves
    15013
    26 Jan '08 15:10
    In my search for a book as described earlier, I came across Bent Larsen's "Best Games of Chess: Master of Counter Attack"

    Anybody read it?

    D
  4. Standard memberadam warlock
    Baby Gauss
    Ceres
    Joined
    14 Oct '06
    Moves
    18375
    26 Jan '08 15:11
    Originally posted by Ragnorak
    "Winning line".

    Polgar gives a mating line in the text, but she doesn't consider 3...Kf7, whereby a rook is lost and the bishop can be exchanged for a rook, removing the mate thread and giving a won endgame for white.

    Polgar gives... 1. Rxg6+ Kh8 2. Rxh6+ Kg7 3. Rg6+ Kh8 4. Qh5#

    D
    Yep the 3. ... Kf7 was the line I was looking at that had no forced mate. But why doesn't she consider that on her book? Yes black is lost anyway but at least doesn't get mated right away.
  5. Standard memberRagnorak
    For RHP addons...
    tinyurl.com/yssp6g
    Joined
    16 Mar '04
    Moves
    15013
    26 Jan '08 15:18
    Originally posted by adam warlock
    Yep the 3. ... Kf7 was the line I was looking at that had no forced mate. But why doesn't she consider that on her book?
    I don't know. It seems to be (a very rare) oversight.

    D
  6. Standard memberChaswray
    NUTTING BUSTER
    Baseball Purgatory
    Joined
    10 Oct '02
    Moves
    131587
    26 Jan '08 15:20
    Originally posted by ares3
    No, after Bc6 he loses the wQ.
    Actually, forget that idea, Bf5+ followed by Be4 seems sound.
    Doesn't Bf5+ lose the Bishop to exf5?
  7. Joined
    13 Jan '08
    Moves
    550
    26 Jan '08 15:21
    The e-pawn has been taken. That was the first part of the question.
  8. Standard memberRagnorak
    For RHP addons...
    tinyurl.com/yssp6g
    Joined
    16 Mar '04
    Moves
    15013
    26 Jan '08 15:27
    Originally posted by Chaswray
    Doesn't Bf5+ lose the Bishop to exf5?
    By taking the pawn with the bishop, you are "victim" to the pinning tactic Bc6. You can't immediately interpose the white bishop with Bd5 as that square is protected by the black rook, but with the intermediate check of Bf5+, you can then block the pin with Be4.

    D
  9. Standard memberChaswray
    NUTTING BUSTER
    Baseball Purgatory
    Joined
    10 Oct '02
    Moves
    131587
    26 Jan '08 15:271 edit
    Originally posted by ares3
    The e-pawn has been taken. That was the first part of the question.
    Sorry, my oversight😳
  10. Joined
    13 Jan '08
    Moves
    550
    26 Jan '08 15:34
    Originally posted by Ragnorak
    By taking the pawn with the bishop, you are "victim" to the pinning tactic Bc6. You can't immediately interpose the white bishop with Bd5 as that square is protected by the black rook, but with the intermediate check of Bf5+, you can then block the pin with Be4.

    D
    So was I right?
  11. Joined
    13 Jan '08
    Moves
    550
    26 Jan '08 15:35
    Originally posted by Chaswray
    Sorry, my oversight😳
    That's OK, I forgive you. 😛
  12. Standard memberRagnorak
    For RHP addons...
    tinyurl.com/yssp6g
    Joined
    16 Mar '04
    Moves
    15013
    26 Jan '08 15:39
    Originally posted by ares3
    So was I right?
    Your edit was. 😉

    D
  13. Joined
    13 Jan '08
    Moves
    550
    26 Jan '08 15:44
    Originally posted by Ragnorak
    Your edit was. 😉

    D
    Thanks... the edit was in place before you said the answer though.🙂
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree