as a first thought: the knight cannot stop alone the 3 white pawns, so tha black King has to come to help...and in the mean time white can convert on the Kinsgide...
I would do like this for white: 1 g3 obvious N somewhere, King as much as possible to the center-Kingside(like e4 or f4) of the board, after that push a bit the h pawn(as much as possible without putting it in danger), after that start to push pawns on the queenside, so black has to go with the king, and when the king is going I would go on the king side to take black king pawn and to promote white...
P.S. I am no endgame expert
Originally posted by paulbuchmanfromficsWhile we are waiting for specialists I would say that I would rather be white here. But probably I am missing something. I would try to occupy his king and knight with three connected passed pawns and try to take my queen on the h-file.
[fen]5k2/7p/8/8/2n5/8/PPP4P/7K [/fen]
White To Move
Can he win this?
This is not a test.
I would really just like to know if correct play is a forced draw or not.
However if you (being so strong player) ask this question I am sure I am missing a lot of things here you already know.
With proper care to correct sequence of moves after b3 black can draw the game in a technical book draw. It is necessary for black King to begin with e7-d6 -c5 to blockade and then remove as many queenside white pawns as is possible. The white must cross queenside to defend the white pawns from black King and N of course. Black has no chance of winning the game as to advance and promote the lone black h pawn means allowing remaining white pawns to advance with white King assistance.A technically difficult but managable draw for black---😉
I played two blitz games with my friend from the diagram.
With white, I won but only by luck. He snagged the h pawn, and I sacked the b pawn to get the queening square for my king. I then would have queened on c8.
With black, I managed to draw it (mostly luck).
I removed one of the queenside pawns with my knight. I then blockaded the remaining two pawns. In the final position, the pawns couldn't advance, my opponent had an h pawn and king on the h file, and I had my king on the f file (stalemating).
I am pretty sure the knight vs three pawns without the h pawns would draw. It was the h pawns that made it confusing.
The simplest of endings have surprising things hidden in them.
Just look at Pal Benko's columns in Chess Life.
* The columns have been made into a couple books as well (Chess Endgame Lessons 1 & 2).
Thanks to everyone for all the great answers.
I was always leaning toward a draw, but I was a little afraid of some hidden resource here or there.
If two good endgame players want to try this out with a set piece game, I would be happy to watch. 🙂
It's not necessary though.
Thanks again for looking/answering.
Originally posted by paulbuchmanfromficsDid you try 1.a4!? N:b2 2.a5 Na4 (or Nc4) 3.a6 ...
I played two blitz games with my friend from the diagram.
With white, I won but only by luck. He snagged the h pawn, and I sacked the b pawn to get the queening square for my king. I then would have queened on c8.
With black, I managed to draw it (mostly luck).
I removed one of the queenside pawns with my knight. I then blockaded the re ...[text shortened]... .
* The columns have been made into a couple books as well (Chess Endgame Lessons 1 & 2).