14 Aug '12 19:06>1 edit
Originally posted by Paul LeggettChess is a complex game, but when a new user is surprised by a rule they did not know yet the standard answer is as follows:
Hi Tim,
I think people may not be giving your question a fair hearing due to semantics.
We all know that a forced draw is legal, but that is not what you are asking. If I understand you correctly, your question can be restated to ask "Are the rules allowing a defender to force a draw a fair result for a game?"
I think this is a f when my opponent blunders, and I just happen to be the guy across the board at the time!
"War is war, loser".
Once a chess player understands this concept, they will understand why it is perfectly fine to force a draw, take a pawn enpassant, be unable to castle out of or through check, time banks, vacation, etc.
Another way to approach the situation is this. If you are in a seemingly losing position do you want to lose? If you have an option to draw the game, will you try? You should, and if you don't want to force a draw based on honor or any other silly reasoning you have no business playing chess.
On the plus side, if a rule you didn't understand pisses you off, you are likely to remember the rule. The more you know about the chess the better, and every rule that pissed you off at one point will make you smile later when you use it to your advantage. Anyone complaining and wanting to change a rule may as well complain the sky is blue and not yellow like the sun. It's blue, get over it and move on.
P-