Originally posted by cmsMasterYes, but while the Botvinik setup can theoretically be played against anything, I don't particularly like it against the symmetric variation.
1.e4 c5 2.c4 and the symmetrical English appears...I've seen it before, it really bothers me. 🙁
Edit: CMSMaster has convinced me of the need to play Rg1 and the freak attack
Originally posted by cmsMasterPlay the ultrasymmetrical. This opening offers the chances to the side who knows the theory better. White should be better but one ?! or ? move and black might possibly win.
1.e4 c5 2.c4 and the symmetrical English appears...I've seen it before, it really bothers me. 🙁
Originally posted by zebanoI think someone is trying to play that against me.
Yes, but while the Botvinik setup can theoretically be played against anything, I don't particularly like it against the symmetric variation.
Edit: CMSMaster has convinced me of the need to play Rg1 and the freak attack
I just thought he was mental.
Originally posted by Diet CokeIt's extremely tactical. I have a sample game in one of my books which is just great (I think it's Polgar, J vrs. Shirov but I can't find the game online - the book is Neil McDonald's Chess: The Art of Logical Thinking: From the First Move to the Last)
I think someone is trying to play that against me.
I just thought he was mental.
Realistically speaking, since in many lines Rg1 and g4 are played if black castles short, there is little reason to commit to this idea so early. Instead normal development and 0-0-0 is probably better when you can latter decide to go all out.
Originally posted by zebanoyeah I dont know if you can call that a botvinnik system as typically with that system black doesnt play c5, and whites king knight goes to e2.
Yes, but while the Botvinik setup can theoretically be played against anything, I don't particularly like it against the symmetric variation.
Edit: CMSMaster has convinced me of the need to play Rg1 and the freak attack
its closer to the symnetrical english then the botvinnik imo.
Originally posted by buffalobill
Explain why 1. e4 is the preferred opening of the +1900 players on this site and the one that has the best win ratio for White. And that the best winning chances for Black are 1. ...e5
1. e4 is the preferred opening period. It is the most common moves at all levels. However, at the GM level, d4 is not too far off in popularity. Moreover at the levels below ~2500, d4 scores slightly better overall (not talking about specific variations). After ~2500, e4 scores better than all other moves. This may suggest that e4 takes longer to master and fully realize the advantage it offers, while d4 relies less on concrete knowledge and thus, the advantage may be realized with less knowledge. This is based on Chessbase Mega Database 2007, but the interpretation is my own.
In any case, e4 is most likely the best move objectively (engines like Rybka also score about 2% higher with e4 than with anything else), if only slightly so. However, it is a complicated move, full of tactics and sacrifices seemingly out of nowhere. Most troubling is that White's advantage is very delicate. One wrong move may give black immediate equality and even advantage. Of course, this applies to black too.
Originally posted by Dutch DefenseThose are probably the worst variations I can possibly think of. Basically what I read there was:
If they play the dragon, I play the Levenfish Attack Variation (6.f4). Otherwise, I'll play the Smith-Morra Gambit. 😀
"If they play the Dragon, I will play the worst line I can think of against it, else, I will play the worst line possible against the Sicilian except the Wing Gambit."
😀
But seriously.