10 Oct '12 20:43>
Well I finally got myself some sort of over the board grade, I haven't lost a graded game yet this season, and none of my games have been against anyone with a solid established grade, so at the moment it's a pretty meaningless number, but as I'm entering a couple of congresses, and am in my club team for the league match next week, it should firm up quite quickly.
Here it is anyway
http://www.robertchess.org.uk/North/pr.php?id=57
Now I know most of the stronger players use this website as a correspondence chess site, "analyse board", opening books etc. I have been using it for over the board practice. I try and concentrate on one game at a time if I have a fast moving opponent and will think for only a minute or so about each move. I set up a board and do not move the pieces. I'm not interested in an online grade, but I am interested in getting and improving an over the board grade.
I'm not sure where I've got the idea, but I reckon the standard of play compared to rating here, is about 200 points weaker than I expect a player to be in the flesh. i.e., I feel I have a decent chance against a 1500 player on here, I'd expect similar odds against a 1300 OTB player. Probably the same on chess.com. I don't think the difference in rules (ability to use analyse board etc) makes a meaningful difference, because it just means a 1800 player might play like a 1900 player, but as they're graded 1900 too, the important factor when relating it to an OTb grade is surely how I approach my games. The only difference I can see is the "endurance" element, when I play an endgame on here, I haven't usually already been concentrating hard for a couple of hours.
I want to hit 100 ECF this season, which is 1450 WCU, I'm interested in peoples comments on what sort of level I'd need to get on here, treating games as OTB games, to be the equivalent of a 100 ECF player.
Here it is anyway
http://www.robertchess.org.uk/North/pr.php?id=57
Now I know most of the stronger players use this website as a correspondence chess site, "analyse board", opening books etc. I have been using it for over the board practice. I try and concentrate on one game at a time if I have a fast moving opponent and will think for only a minute or so about each move. I set up a board and do not move the pieces. I'm not interested in an online grade, but I am interested in getting and improving an over the board grade.
I'm not sure where I've got the idea, but I reckon the standard of play compared to rating here, is about 200 points weaker than I expect a player to be in the flesh. i.e., I feel I have a decent chance against a 1500 player on here, I'd expect similar odds against a 1300 OTB player. Probably the same on chess.com. I don't think the difference in rules (ability to use analyse board etc) makes a meaningful difference, because it just means a 1800 player might play like a 1900 player, but as they're graded 1900 too, the important factor when relating it to an OTb grade is surely how I approach my games. The only difference I can see is the "endurance" element, when I play an endgame on here, I haven't usually already been concentrating hard for a couple of hours.
I want to hit 100 ECF this season, which is 1450 WCU, I'm interested in peoples comments on what sort of level I'd need to get on here, treating games as OTB games, to be the equivalent of a 100 ECF player.