Originally posted by nicohuyboomOur Constitution states no such thing. I understand that Russia's constitution or that of the former USSR did so state. Keep to your own competencies, please. Or remember Clint's admonition, "A man has to know his limitations".
[b]The U.S. Constitution specifies that the church and state be kept separate.
Originally posted by ExyThe same player with the same photo (whoever he is) plays as Cyrano at Gameknot. I see he's now removed his pic.
Afro Ambanelli is a FIDE referee and the man behind the two RHP accounts Edmond Dantes and Ironman31 - or is he? That's what I want to know? Pulsatilla was his clan leader and she has met him in Italy, so either this person is a cheat pretending to be xxxxxxor he is risking his entire rep by cheating openly in game after, public game at RHP. I am ...[text shortened]... g that the Admins investigated this and gave him a chance to explain before enforcing their ban.
1 edit
Originally posted by jebrydzagin"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
Our Constitution states no such thing. I understand that Russia's constitution or that of the former USSR did so state. Keep to your own competencies, please. Or remember Clint's admonition, "A man has to know his limitations".
The "Establishment Clause" from the First Amendment to the United States' Constitution.
You should be proud of it - we have no such assurance here in the UK
Originally posted by dottewellNot really he plays few games .
According to various websites, Jean Hebert has achieved grandmaster status at correspondence chess (whatever that means) and is one of Canada's 10 strongest-ever players at OTB.
Expect him therefore to rise to the top at RHP extremely quickly.
Originally posted by El BrutoI rec that!!!
I'm a 2000 ELO ITALY because I play my last tournament in 1984 !!!
In all this year a play lightning chess (15 minutes games) and I won with IM , FM and a lot of master .... and in simul Andras Adorjan GM.
But in Playchess.com ( nick Temujin - my best rating in lighting games was more than 2200 - With an old nick ( max-pr 2397 ELO ).
So I invite all che ...[text shortened]... engine that see Tg8 in my game with Black against Perrys.
Thanks and farewell to all.
BYE BYE
Originally posted by skeeterYou obviously didn't read the rest of my post.
I disagree. It is possible to draw against engines because for some reason engines find it difficult to recognise the 3peat position / perpetual check / insufficient mating material senarios and so you can manouvre them. Also engines are incapable of knowing the importance of the game in the context of a tourney so if you only need a draw to win a round the ...[text shortened]... e player in the final round. I have also placed this information before a games mod.
skeeter
I was responding to El Bruto who believes what you quoted me as saying. I gave a recently finished draw of mine against Yozzer and pointed out that very few of my moves were what Fritz suggests thereby showing it was possible for a human player of not titled strength to draw with an engine.
The section you quoted was sarcasm and is clearly indicated by it's context.
Originally posted by XanthosNZThe fact that someone was banned for cheating does not mean that they used an engine in every one of their games. I split two games against Yozzer where he had matchups that were high (mid 70's) but not outrageous; in a rematch two weeks later, he won both and matched up about 90%. Maybe he didn't like losing.😕
You obviously didn't read the rest of my post.
I was responding to El Bruto who believes what you quoted me as saying. I gave a recently finished draw of mine against Yozzer and pointed out that very few of my moves were what Fritz suggests thereby showing it was possible for a human player of not titled strength to draw with an engine.
The section you quoted was sarcasm and is clearly indicated by it's context.
Excuse me !
I believe that this is an important point !!
When a good master play a chess game with a lot of time for the analysis is possible that he make 85% or more of the Engines move.
The difference between a GM or IM and a strong amateur is 2 or 3 very good moves.
A lot of times when I meet IM or FM in longue time tournament or 15 minutes tournaments I loss for one or two moves that my opponent see and I don't see.
I play blitz ( LIGHTNING 5 MINUTES ) game that are 90% or more the Junior move.....because I remember all moves when I play with greast concentration ( attention ) .
I want say that a strong player need engines-help only 4/5 time into a game. So I believe that is very difficult tell "this is a cheater"
I make engines tournament a is really interestin see that in the same position the eveluation is very different amoung Fritz, Hiarcs,Junior and Shredder.
Exemple the old Gambit Tiger is stronger than Shredder or Hiarsc when the game is very unbalanced exemple Leningrad Dutch ( that true 60% time ) but is incredible because in other tournament with different position like Spanish in really weaker.
I'M NOT SO SURE THAT CHEAT POLICE IS ALWAY RIGHT.
So I finish my games and after I'll leave RHP.
I really sorry.
Max
Originally posted by El BrutoPurtroppo stai sprecando fiato perchè qui credono solo a quello che vedono.
I'm a 2000 ELO ITALY because I play my last tournament in 1984 !!!
In all this year a play lightning chess (15 minutes games) and I won with IM , FM and a lot of master .... and in simul Andras Adorjan GM.
But in Playchess.com ( nick Temujin - my best rating in lighting games was more than 2200 - With an old nick ( max-pr 2397 ELO ).
So I invite all che ...[text shortened]... engine that see Tg8 in my game with Black against Perrys.
Thanks and farewell to all.
BYE BYE
Se solo afro avesse un rating ufficiale un pò meglio della sua ultima performance (vecchia di anni ) allora qui non parlerebbe nessuno: anch'io sono convinto che un buon giocatore con un rating di 2000 può benissimo andare molto più su negli scacchi per corrispondenza,visti i tempi molto lunghi che vengono concessi per ogni mossa,se un candidato pensa per una settimana su una mossa,alla fine la mossa perfetta per una data posizione la trova,eccome!
A me dispiace molto di tutto questo casino ma purtroppo non ci possiamo fare niente,l'unica consolazione è che fortunatamente questo non è l'unico sito dove giocare scacchi per corrispondenza.........
Originally posted by RavelloI've no idea what you just said, but I'll rec it anyway.
Purtroppo stai sprecando fiato perchè qui credono solo a quello che vedono.
Se solo afro avesse un rating ufficiale un pò meglio della sua ultima performance (vecchia di anni ) allora qui non parlerebbe nessuno: anch'io sono convinto che un buon giocatore con un rating di 2000 può benissimo andare molto più su negli scacchi per corrispondenza,visti i tempi ...[text shortened]... è che fortunatamente questo non è l'unico sito dove giocare scacchi per corrispondenza.........
Originally posted by RavelloI couldn't have said it better myself🙂
Purtroppo stai sprecando fiato perchè qui credono solo a quello che vedono.
Se solo afro avesse un rating ufficiale un pò meglio della sua ultima performance (vecchia di anni ) allora qui non parlerebbe nessuno: anch'io sono convinto che un buon giocatore con un rating di 2000 può benissimo andare molto più su negli scacchi per corrispondenza,visti i tempi ...[text shortened]... è che fortunatamente questo non è l'unico sito dove giocare scacchi per corrispondenza.........
Originally posted by El BrutoWith all due respect to your ability, El Bruto... the first and second games I played against you, losing one and drawing the other, ALL YOUR MOVES MATCHED FRITZ 100%!!!
Excuse me !
I believe that this is an important point !!
When a good master play a chess game with a lot of time for the analysis is possible that he make 85% or more of the Engines move.
The difference between a GM or IM and a strong amateur is 2 or 3 very good moves.
A lot of times when I meet IM or FM in longue time tournament or 15 minutes tourname ...[text shortened]... AT POLICE IS ALWAY RIGHT.
So I finish my games and after I'll leave RHP.
I really sorry.
Max
The games are a matter of RECORDED HISTORY and anyone can d/l them and see for themselves... There's no way that ALL YOUR MOVES should have matched 100%!
1 edit
Originally posted by arrakishttp://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=18804
...Cheating accusation...
Why on earth would you say this on the forum, when there is an obvious alternative?
Send your analysis to the cheat police. You may be right, but you may very well be wrong. In fact, the only thing we know for certain at this point is that you're a drongo.