11 Jan '08 07:38>1 edit
Hmmm...If it was me I would accept. You should play a couple of 20-30min games with them...I will play you... and then decide which one you like better.
Originally posted by !~TONY~!I agree. I always play 3...g5 as black. The Kieseritzky (4.h4 g4 5.Ne5) isn't looking that great for white at the moment. As white I usually try 4.d4, but unfortunately it doesn't seem easy to avoid the draw after 4...g4 5.Bxf4 gxf3 6.Qxf3 Nc6 7.Bc4 d5! 8.Bxd5 Nxd4 9.Bxf7+ Kxf7 10.Qh5+ Ke6. White has nothing better than a perpetual. Black can try 10...Kg7, which is unclear.
I think it's generally accepted that the most testing variation of the King's Gambit is 3..g5! Learn the theory and just grab the pawn! This move was recommended by John Emms in "Play the Open Games as Black". I would highly recommend this book if you play 1..e5. It's a great book, and gives various options against literally everything you could think of except the Ruy Lopez.
Originally posted by chessisvanitythis is really a matter of taste.
well...i'm talking about a tournament coming up (real otb)
so if i face the KG....is it the Falkbeer or KGA?
Originally posted by hammster21This is the only line I've ever had success with against the KG. The g5 stuff is good, but long term my weak squares (g7, f6) tend to come back to haunt me.
You might try the Abbazia defense(Modern Defense is its listed in the games explorer)
1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.Nf3 d5
If white plays the kings bishops gambit (3. Bc4), then your going to need something else.
Originally posted by Green PaladinEarly ...g5 should be met with h4!
KGA followed by ... g5 is really nasty for white
Originally posted by Squelchbelchh4... g4. I played h4 in my game above.
Early ...g5 should be met with h4!
Really nasty for white from a psychological POV? I just think "great! You just keep weakening your KS matey...!"
Game 3988126
Originally posted by Green PaladinAfter 1.e4...e5, 2.f4...exf4, 3.Nf3...d6 4.Bc4! is probably best.
h4... g4. I played h4 in my game above.
Originally posted by SquelchbelchThanks! I'll definitely play 4. Bc4 from now on. I really hate having to retreat my knight surrendering a tempo and development.
After [b]1.e4...e5, 2.f4...exf4, 3.Nf3...d6 4.Bc4! is probably best.
According to Thomas Johansson in his excellent The King's Gambit for the Creative Aggressor!:
"[i]This is usually dismissed as leading to the Hanstein gambit after 4...h6, 5.d4...g5, 6.0-0 which is good for black. However, we have no intention of playing 5.d4?!
By ...[text shortened]... nty of theory with either 5.b3!? or 5.d3!? making strong cases for both.[/b]
Originally posted by chessisvanityTo accept or to decline depends on your preference. The last time I had to play it I decided to accept it was to refute it. I regreted accepting it.
So as you all know... cause you follow my every move....
I used to play Hyper-modern crap openings....
I switched to Classical openings....1.e4 1.d4 and 1...e5 and 1...d5
The only problem opening I have is the Kings Gambit...
Should I accept or decline? I'm in favour of declining....
Originally posted by !~TONY~!I agree 100%
I think it's generally accepted that the most testing variation of the King's Gambit is 3..g5! Learn the theory and just grab the pawn! This move was recommended by John Emms in "Play the Open Games as Black". I would highly recommend this book if you play 1..e5. It's a great book, and gives various options against literally everything you could think of except the Ruy Lopez.
Originally posted by hammster21I have a game open! I would love for you to play h3 against me!
The Kieseritzky is a difficult line to play against, thats why I prefer 4.h3 against it. It does open a severe hole on g3, which can spell disaster if penetrated by a Knight, but it also locks in blacks weak pawn at g5, which he may have to take time to protect. I like this move as it keeps White's king side more compact while still opening up blacks. In ...[text shortened]... Bg8 43. h5 Bxc4 44. h6 Bg8 45. Kf6
{chessmatic forfeits on time} 1-0