1. Standard memberXanthosNZ
    Cancerous Bus Crash
    p^2.sin(phi)
    Joined
    06 Sep '04
    Moves
    25076
    16 Mar '06 06:15
    Originally posted by flyUnity
    Oh I had a plan, I usually have several plans, its just that my plans are always stopped, because they see my plans too, Im no good at finding them secret plans
    The key to playing good chess is playing solid or forcing moves and eventually pressuring your opponent into a mistake (or just squeeze them out of the game).

    A recent game that really illustrates that point is Bacrot - Topalov from Morelia/Linares. You can find the game here with extensive notation: http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2956

    Topalov didn't play extravagent plans, he just played solid moves and countered all of Bacrot's ideas with good moves. If this method can be used to beat a Super GM it can be used to beat anyone.
  2. Mumbai, India
    Joined
    12 Oct '05
    Moves
    5445
    16 Mar '06 08:02
    Why did you resign? I think you could have prevented the pawn from promotion by taking your queen to e2. And then if he moves his rook, you had a chance of checkmating him...

    Although I believe you were at an disadvantage at that point, resignation seemed a little foolish to me..

    However, I may be wrong as I am often termed as foolish and very seldom resign..
  3. Standard memberRagnorak
    For RHP addons...
    tinyurl.com/yssp6g
    Joined
    16 Mar '04
    Moves
    15013
    16 Mar '06 11:03
    Originally posted by yashsr
    Why did you resign? I think you could have prevented the pawn from promotion by taking your queen to e2. And then if he moves his rook, you had a chance of checkmating him...

    Although I believe you were at an disadvantage at that point, resignation seemed a little foolish to me..

    However, I may be wrong as I am often termed as foolish and very seldom resign..
    38. Qe2 Qxd1 39 Qxd1 Rc1

    D
  4. Standard memberDerfel Cadarn
    The Mighty
    Rocky Mountains
    Joined
    20 Aug '05
    Moves
    17145
    16 Mar '06 12:38
    I personally wouldn't have resigned until your threat of the back row mate was gone. Even the best fall victim to that sometimes.
  5. Joined
    17 Dec '04
    Moves
    5587
    16 Mar '06 13:531 edit
    Originally posted by flyUnity
    24 Ne4 wouldve been a dead give away. I cant see how it can help
    What in the ................. was I lookin at! I meant move 23.
  6. 127.0.0.1
    Joined
    27 Oct '05
    Moves
    158564
    16 Mar '06 14:04
    Originally posted by micarr
    I am assuming you know this is the Sicilian opening and he plays an early 5..e5 which is slightly dubious because it gives him a backward d pawn and instead of the retreat 6. Nf3 you could have continued to develop your pieces by Bb5+ forcing either 7..Nbd7 (or Bd7) 8. Bxd7+ and then 9. Nf5.
    GMs regularily play the schivishnikov... (early e5). However that game was wierd. When playing the early e5 normally white has played Nc3 instead of d6. Then since White decided to play Nd4-f3 instead of Nd4-b5 (mainline) black would have had both d7-d5 or Bb4 as responses.

    Those are I'm not an expert on the najdorf, but I do believe an early e5 is part of the typical plan, provided that white doesn't play Bc4. I have no idea if early is that early or not though.
  7. Mumbai, India
    Joined
    12 Oct '05
    Moves
    5445
    16 Mar '06 14:31
    Originally posted by Ragnorak
    38. Qe2 Qxd1 39 Qxd1 Rc1

    D
    Thanks ragnorak, now I get it 🙂
  8. back in business
    Joined
    25 Aug '04
    Moves
    1264
    16 Mar '06 14:53
    Originally posted by Derfel Cadarn
    I personally wouldn't have resigned until your threat of the back row mate was gone. Even the best fall victim to that sometimes.
    "One cannot refuse to eat just because there is a chance of being choked"

    -Chinese proverb
  9. Somewhere out there!
    Joined
    09 Nov '04
    Moves
    2700
    16 Mar '06 15:25
    how about 33 f4 instead of g3?
  10. Joined
    21 Oct '04
    Moves
    17038
    16 Mar '06 16:17
    Originally posted by Testrider
    how about 33 f4 instead of g3?
    The reason I did 33 g3, instead of f4, is that I was already in danger of back rank CM. f4 dont really help me in that area. why is f4 better?
  11. Back Home.
    Joined
    14 Mar '06
    Moves
    772
    18 Mar '06 05:39
    why did you resign instead of making this move..... 38. Qe5h5? you protect your rook without critically endagering oyour queen?
  12. Joined
    21 Oct '04
    Moves
    17038
    18 Mar '06 14:54
    Originally posted by CrUiZeR
    why did you resign instead of making this move..... 38. Qe5h5? you protect your rook without critically endagering oyour queen?
    As Ragnorak stated above 38. Qh5 Qxd1 39 Qxd1 Rc1.

    He would just take my rook, Id have to take back, then he moves rook down, and queen his pawn
  13. Account suspended
    Joined
    10 Mar '06
    Moves
    4933
    19 Mar '06 15:21
    Considering the enormous rating difference your opponent had over you, I thought you did a hell of a job.
  14. Back Home.
    Joined
    14 Mar '06
    Moves
    772
    12 Apr '06 10:24
    Originally posted by flyUnity
    As Ragnorak stated above 38. Qh5 Qxd1 39 Qxd1 Rc1.

    He would just take my rook, Id have to take back, then he moves rook down, and queen his pawn
    Yeah but...40.Qxc1 d8(Q)
    41.Qxd1
    his next move would have been either: f6,g6 or h6. You would've had the advantage
  15. Standard memberRagnorak
    For RHP addons...
    tinyurl.com/yssp6g
    Joined
    16 Mar '04
    Moves
    15013
    12 Apr '06 10:56
    Originally posted by CrUiZeR
    Yeah but...40.Qxc1 d8(Q)
    41.Qxd1
    his next move would have been either: f6,g6 or h6. You would've had the advantage
    40...dxc1(Q)

    D
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree