Originally posted by PhlabibitLets forget the "good bans" (bad bans) and set those things to one side for a moment.
These were "good bans" unlike bans where your friends are involved (bad bans)?
P-
Ok, Now these people are all found to be guilty beyond any reasonable doubt, or they would still be with us.
Why then once the guilt has been proven, are the results and the games these results were found in, not posted for all of us to see?
Originally posted by Very RustyBecause the next guy would know what NOT to do while cheating. Can't teach people to cheat better by showing WHY they were deemed a cheat.
Lets forget the "good bans" (bad bans) and set those things to one side for a moment.
Ok, Now these people are all found to be guilty beyond any reasonable doubt, or they would still be with us.
Why then once the guilt has been proven, are the results and the games these results were found in, not posted for all of us to see?
P-
Originally posted by PhlabibitYou don't have to give away how they were found to be cheats, by showing percentages that were found, and the games that were used for these findings.
Because the next guy would know what NOT to do while cheating. Can't teach people to cheat better by showing WHY they were deemed a cheat.
P-
I know there are those who do not agree about stephane. Would this not put any doubt to rest once and for all?
I am also happy to see that the game mods are back in operation, and kudo's to who ever you may be!
Originally posted by Very RustyPeople are welcome to doubt the results, or even run some games to view what the admins may have seen to decide a user is cheating.
You don't have to give away how they were found to be cheats, by showing percentages that were found, and the games that were used for these findings.
I know there are those who do not agree about stephane. Would this not put any doubt to rest once and for all?
I am also happy to see that the game mods are back in operation, and kudo's to who ever you may be!
Any info given is info to help the next cheat, percents, games... anything.
P-
Originally posted by Very Rustyfor every cheat there have been those who didn't think he was guilty, no matter how blatant the guy was. most of those people act based on emotion, with little or no understanding of what it's all about.
You don't have to give away how they were found to be cheats, by showing percentages that were found, and the games that were used for these findings.
I know there are those who do not agree about stephane. Would this not put any doubt to rest once and for all?
I am also happy to see that the game mods are back in operation, and kudo's to who ever you may be!
if you know who's banned, and understand anything about cheat detection, you can easily pick suitable test data from that player and see for yourself.
.Originally posted by wormwoodOK, it is obvious I do not know how it is done. I only thought it might help to convince those who were not quite convinced.
for every cheat there have been those who didn't think he was guilty, no matter how blatant the guy was. most of those people act based on emotion, with little or no understanding of what it's all about.
if you know who's banned, and understand anything about cheat detection, you can easily pick suitable test data from that player and see for yourself.
Thank You for the explanation! So those who actually do the detection would have to be very trust worthy, or they themselves would be able to cheat without detection?