Non-Sub Brilliancies
11 Sep '08 16:46Got it!
Open with.
1.e3 e6 2.e4 e5! That's TN territory.
Open with.
1.e3 e6 2.e4 e5! That's TN territory.
15 Sep '08 21:051 edit 16 Sep '08 03:381 editOriginally posted by robbie carrobieI don't see what's so special about this. You're opponent made a gross blunder and you won, try crushing an opponent like that when they make no gross tactical blunders.
ok here is my brilliancy, at the time I was reading Sargents book on Morphy and i was trying to emulate the great one.
[pgn][Event "Open invite"]
[Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2007.10.14"]
[EndDate "2007.10.20"]
[Round "?"]
[White "robbie carrobie"]
[Black "ookaboolakoonga"]
[WhiteRating "1507"]
[BlackRating "1351"]
[WhiteELO 'i dont see why i should lose just because a played a bad opening',
16 Sep '08 10:46Originally posted by tomtom232rather interestingly many of the uninitiated said the same thing about the early impressionist movement in art, Van Gogh himself never sold a painting? why because the general public never really understood what was happening on the canvas. perhaps you need to look deeper, was it not Emanual Lasker who stated that, 'without error there can be no brilliancy'.
I don't see what's so special about this. You're opponent made a gross blunder and you won, try crushing an opponent like that when they make no gross tactical blunders.
16 Sep '08 14:11Originally posted by robbie carrobie"without error there can be no brilliancy" - me
rather interestingly many of the uninitiated said the same thing about the early impressionist movement in art, Van Gogh himself never sold a painting? why because the general public never really understood what was happening on the canvas. perhaps you need to look deeper, was it not Emanual Lasker who stated that, 'without error there can be no brilliancy'.
16 Sep '08 17:251 editOriginally posted by robbie carrobieThere is a difference between just an error and moving your piece into a pawn fork... I'm just being tough on you because you should expect to punish your opponents like that when they make tactical blunders. You had the game won after he walked into a pawn fork... Try winning a game where your opponent moves a pawn in front of his king at the wrong time and you have to have the patience and the vision to pull off a brilliancy ten moves later.
rather interestingly many of the uninitiated said the same thing about the early impressionist movement in art, Van Gogh himself never sold a painting? why because the general public never really understood what was happening on the canvas. perhaps you need to look deeper, was it not Emanual Lasker who stated that, 'without error there can be no brilliancy'.
16 Sep '08 19:08Originally posted by tomtom232Oh dear. Tut-Tut Tom-Tom.
Iinferring that this game is on a level of artistic beauty comparable to the paintings of Van Gogh is a serious lapse in judgement.
16 Sep '08 19:42Originally posted by greenpawn34BWAHAHA!
Oh dear. Tut-Tut Tom-Tom.
Robbie's exploitation of the bad 4th. move allowing the courageous
d-pawn to sac itself on f7 so the Queen can enter the fray with
a check and pick up the loose Knight was enlightening and instructive.
The symphony was complete when the Knight did a dance of
death around the hapless Black King.
Van Gogh's paintings pale by comparison.
Bravo McRobbie. Scotland's McMorphy.
16 Sep '08 22:04Originally posted by greenpawn34Will Robbie be able to sell his game with ookaboolakoonga for millions, or will that only happen after he's dead and gone?
Oh dear. Tut-Tut Tom-Tom.
Robbie's exploitation of the bad 4th. move allowing the courageous
d-pawn to sac itself on f7 so the Queen can enter the fray with
a check and pick up the loose Knight was enlightening and instructive.
The symphony was complete when the Knight did a dance of
death around the hapless Black King.
Van Gogh's paintings pale by comparison.
Bravo McRobbie. Scotland's McMorphy.
16 Sep '08 22:141 editOriginally posted by Mad Rooklol, the opponents name itself should be copyrighted, but i did read that Steintz and perhaps even Lasker and others did try to copyright their games early on, i don't know if they succeeded, but Mad rook my friend, you need not fear, all my masterpieces are covered by the GNU public licensing and are free for personal non commercial distribution.
Will Robbie be able to sell his game with ookaboolakoonga for millions, or will that only happen after he's dead and gone?
Back to Top