Only Chess
27 May 06
28 May 06
1 edit
Originally posted by prosoccerIf you notice, i mentioned two of your suggestions, three if you count the fact that i was pointing out the fact indirectly that i dont have the time to check all my opponents games because i have a heavier workload.
I gave you several options, not only playing friends so don't hang on that one and not mention the others.
It is Illuminati not Luminati.
And your other point, if you remember your own post, i answered in a previous posting (you wrote so yourself, remember)
question.
If you're such a big deal, as your profile says, why havent you stumped up the pittence it costs to subscribe?
Isn't the site worth the $25.99, considering all the lively debate, and the english lessons you seem so eager to give?
stop being a baby please.
edit. subscribers dont ditch games in this way. . .FACT.
28 May 06
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundHa ha ha. Maybe you should stay abreast of recent movies before you make accusations.
If you notice, i mentioned two of your suggestions, three if you count the fact that i was pointing out the fact indirectly that i dont have the time to check all my opponents games because i have a heavier workload.
And your other point, if you remember your own post, i answered in a previous posting (you wrote so yourself, remember)
questi ...[text shortened]... ve?
stop being a baby please.
edit. subscribers dont ditch games in this way. . .FACT.
English lessons? I am sorry, I was under the impression that the Illuminati was a historical cult, not a written one.
As for the $25.99, I would say the site is worth it, but for the moment I am not in a position to be shelling out money for things I can get free.
Why must we resort to name calling? Would a mature debate be too much to ask?
28 May 06
Originally posted by prosoccerNow i'm guessing you're about 15 years old, right?
Ha ha ha. Maybe you should stay abreast of recent movies before you make accusations.
English lessons? I am sorry, I was under the impression that the Illuminati was a historical cult, not a written one.
As for the $25.99, I would say the site is worth it, but for the moment I am not in a position to be shelling out money for things I can get free.
Why must we resort to name calling? Would a mature debate be too much to ask?
28 May 06
Originally posted by prosocceri'm cool with that.
Under fifteen and 200 points higher. How does it feel?
Edit: Meh...150 points.
Now i know the level i'm on, i am extremely happy 🙂
just one point bud. . .if you correct someones spelling of a word. . . that is an English lesson.
And drink your milk. 🙂
28 May 06
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundHow can you say that I am correcting your spelling? You missed a large chunk of a word. For all I know you weren't even talking about the Illuminati, you were talking about the famed Luminati, some other band.
i'm cool with that.
Now i know the level i'm on, i am extremely happy 🙂
just one point bud. . .if you correct someones spelling of a word. . . that is an English lesson.
And drink your milk. 🙂
In anticipation of you saying "How did you know who I am talking about then?" I reply that you mentioned it with Opus Dei, where the two are in clear reference to Dan Brown's novels.
Since you did mention both, I assume you read the books. If so, what poor reading comprehension. The word Illuminati would have been put down countless times; thus it would have been simple to remember.
Remember to take your Centrum Selects.
28 May 06
Originally posted by prosoccerok.
How can you say that I am correcting your spelling? You missed a large chunk of a word. For all I know you weren't even talking about the Illuminati, you were talking about the famed Luminati, some other band.
In anticipation of you saying "How did you know who I am talking about then?" I reply that you mentioned it with Opus Dei, where the two are in c ...[text shortened]... times; thus it would have been simple to remember.
Remember to take your Centrum Selects.
now i'm argueing with a kid. i can do this
I was actually reffering to a conspiracy theory surrounding 9/11, not the dan brown book.
you're a good kid, slightly pushy, but you're alright i guess
😀
28 May 06
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundRegardless, unless there is the Conspiracy News Network (CNN..lol) you must have read it before, therefore be able to recognize the spelling.
ok.
now i'm argueing with a kid. i can do this
I was actually reffering to a conspiracy theory surrounding 9/11, not the dan brown book.
you're a good kid, slightly pushy, but you're alright i guess
😀
28 May 06
1 edit
Originally posted by prosoccerSky one, not cnn
Regardless, unless there is the Conspiracy News Network (CNN..lol) you must have read it before, therefore be able to recognize the spelling.
i did actually spell it properly.
i did really, i just checked.
chess i suck at, spelling, i think learned that a while back.
🙂
28 May 06
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundEvery response but 3 that I get on google when I search luminati opus dei 9 11 is in a foreign language. Care to explain the theory?
Sky one, not cnn
i did actually spell it properly.
i did really, i just checked.
chess i suck at, spelling, i think learned that a while back.
🙂