Originally posted by JieYou don't know my true chess skill, you only see my rating at RHP, and that means little as far as my chess skill goes.
Assuming you can do your math correctly, if you joined the site at 1200 and due to study of chess books gained 100 points each year, what would your rating be today?
P-
1 edit
Originally posted by JieFind me ONE user who gained 100 points a year consistanly... you're making crap up.
Math is your problem. You joined in 2008 so
1200 + 0 = 1200
The guy who joined in 2003 gives 5X100=500
1200 + 500 = 1700
Consider taking that flag down, it's been proven you're not from China.
P-
1 edit
Originally posted by JieJie,
The paranoia continues Thread 97551 Why cant some of these [gone] like Philabit and co, concentrate on improving their own chess rather than this obsession? A 1200 player is worried about cheating. Wouldn't the move made by a 1300 player look like cheating to him?
Um, any need for name calling? You seem to have boiled all accusations down to their dumbest level where low rated players really don't have any chance of knowing if a player is cheating.
You're disregarding real situations where there is ample evidence to show a user is cheating... those are threads a moderator will remove if names are named and alerts are given (or not in some cases). The proper course of action is to use the new fair play feature (see site ideas).
P-
Originally posted by PhlabibitMy point is that all of this paranoia is affecting even players not on the first page. A guy rated 1200 has just started a thread about cheating as he is concerned about cheating. A 1200 player is someone who starts a strong attack only to "notice" he has been mated.
Jie,
Um, any need for name calling? You seem to have boiled all accusations down to their dumbest level where low rated players really don't have any chance of knowing if a player is cheating.
You're disregarding real situations where there is ample evidence to show a user is cheating... those are threads a moderator will remove if names are named ...[text shortened]... ses). The proper course of action is to use the new fair play feature (see site ideas).
P-
If those cheater hunters sent feedback to the Forum Moderator instead of being paranoid on the forum, then that would leave time for chess to be discussed.
Originally posted by JieGo discuss chess, if you know anything about it. I'll join you.
My point is that all of this paranoia is affecting even players not on the first page. A guy rated 1200 has just started a thread about cheating as he is concerned about cheating. A 1200 player is someone who starts a strong attack only to "notice" he has been mated.
If those cheater hunters sent feedback to the Forum Moderator instead of being paranoid on the forum, then that would leave time for chess to be discussed.
P-
- Joined
- 09 Nov 06
- Moves
- 0
Originally posted by JieCheating accusations go here:
If those cheater hunters sent feedback to the Forum Moderator instead of being paranoid on the forum, then that would leave time for chess to be discussed.
http://www.redhotpawn.com/fairplay/createticket.php
FAQ
The Forum Moderation team deal with the content in the Public Forums.
Originally posted by JieYes, the similarities between burning someone to death and accusing people of cheating over the internet are countless...
Day after day the topic of the "latest cheater" is introduced and early games of players rising up put on the forum. This looks like the chess equivalent of the Salem Witch trials if you are old enough to understand what those were.
Originally posted by Raven69Like telling a user "Good Riddance" can be compared with murder.
Yes, the similarities between burning someone to death and accusing people of cheating over the internet are countless...
Thread 97461
P-
Apply to join Club 75. You will have to wait before being allowed in as we have restricted membership to only 100 but our objective is to create a cheat free zone.