Iam not a regular subscriber, so i have a limit of 6 games. people, start loosing and they will then stop playing till the time goes out, forbidding me to play more games..... I think RHP should increase the no of games to 10.
Originally posted by rathish Iam not a regular subscriber, so i have a limit of 6 games. people, start loosing and they will then stop playing till the time goes out, forbidding me to play more games..... I think RHP should increase the no of games to 10.
Originally posted by rathish Iam not a regular subscriber, so i have a limit of 6 games. people, start loosing and they will then stop playing till the time goes out, forbidding me to play more games..... I think RHP should increase the no of games to 10.
Oh and then you start more games and more people leave and then you are still stuck so you ask for more games and then more until you effectivly have the same rights as subscribers. Then no one subscribes because it's not worth it, then Russ and Chris go under and RHP ends forever. Nice idea.
Originally posted by rathish Iam not a regular subscriber, so i have a limit of 6 games. people, start loosing and they will then stop playing till the time goes out, forbidding me to play more games..... I think RHP should increase the no of games to 10.
I think you may well have let yourself in for some flak with this post, here's the clean/polite version:
Don't you think it's a great site and you get to play 6 games for free, somone is paying for all of this, ultimately us (the subscribers) but the owners of the site took a financial gamble investing in it and probably still carry some risk. Don't you think 6 games is enough for free? it's supposed tro get you interested enough to subscribe, if rhp started increasing the free games why would anyone subscribe?
Originally posted by rathish Iam not a regular subscriber, so i have a limit of 6 games. people, start loosing and they will then stop playing till the time goes out, forbidding me to play more games..... I think RHP should increase the no of games to 10.
Seriously, you have one game where a guy joined on January 2, played moves on that day and the next, sucked and has now apparently left the site. All your other games have moves in the last day. I don't know what the time controls are in the one game, but the skull should be popping up soon if they are normal ones. Stop yer crying.
Originally posted by stevetodd I think you may well have let yourself in for some flak with this post, here's the clean/polite version:
Don't you think it's a great site and you get to play 6 games for free, somone is paying for all of this, ultimately us (the subscribers) but the owners of the site took a financial gamble investing in it and probably still carry some risk. Don't you t ...[text shortened]... d enough to subscribe, if rhp started increasing the free games why would anyone subscribe?
So, you guys believe that the people who cannot afford to pay should stop playing online chess ????
Originally posted by rathish So, you guys believe that the people who cannot afford to pay should stop playing online chess ????
No, but if you have a problem with the game limits send feedback at the bottom of the page to Russ. It's his choice, not ours.
In the meantime you also have posting rights and have picked up lots of tips and information. And got a lot of feedback from people who are willing to help you with your game. That's not so bad for a freebie.
Originally posted by Sicilian Smaug i did contribute. And its not up to you if i shut up or not, tosser
Ok, last words. Your "contribution" was to suggest he was ugly and smelly when his question was about changing the six game limit for non-subscribers. Think about it.