1. Standard memberRBHILL
    Acts 13:48
    California
    Joined
    21 May '03
    Moves
    227331
    11 Jan '06 21:37
    Originally posted by rathish
    Iam not a regular subscriber, so i have a limit of 6 games. people, start loosing and they will then stop playing till the time goes out, forbidding me to play more games..... I think RHP should increase the no of games to 10.
    So
  2. Joined
    15 Aug '05
    Moves
    96595
    11 Jan '06 21:41

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  3. Scotton Lincolnshire
    Joined
    05 Aug '05
    Moves
    58864
    11 Jan '06 22:07
    Go clan leader!

    Smaug !!!!!!!!!!!!

    RHP- the best fun non-subscribers can have with their trousers on.
  4. Joined
    15 Aug '05
    Moves
    96595
    11 Jan '06 22:151 edit

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  5. Joined
    23 Jul '05
    Moves
    955
    12 Jan '06 00:12
    Originally posted by buffalobill
    Ok, last words. Your "contribution" was to suggest he was ugly and smelly when his question was about changing the six game limit for non-subscribers. Think about it.
    How do you know he's NOT ugly and smelly?
  6. Standard memberTrains44
    Full speed locomotiv
    Account suspended
    Joined
    03 Oct '04
    Moves
    12831
    12 Jan '06 01:53
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    Life sucks.
    1marauder, yer right, life sucks that way.
  7. Account suspended
    Joined
    29 Dec '05
    Moves
    3887
    12 Jan '06 12:32
    Originally posted by Sicilian Smaug
    No one wants to play you because you're ugly and you smell
    Well, then you should stop playing to non subscribers.
  8. Joined
    26 Nov '03
    Moves
    11918
    12 Jan '06 14:281 edit
    Originally posted by rathish
    So, you guys believe that the people who cannot afford to pay should stop playing online chess ????
    Now where did you get that assumption from? what I was pointing out in answer to the statement suggesting that it would be better if non-subscribers were allowed 10 games was:

    1) Getting 6 games free is an excellent freebie on this site for non subscribers

    2) If the site gave more than 6 games the incentive for players to subscibe is diminished

    3) If less players subscibed (see 2 above) then the site would itself become at risk from an economic point of view (you do realise that the site needs financial resources to run itself and that the investors are entitled to at least to hope to make a profit for their outlay?)

    Furthermore if 10 games were given to non subscribers and less players subscibed as a consequence then there would also be less games going on because
    a) the players who did not subscribe but who would have otherwise can only play 10 games instead of unlimited
    b) the same players would not be playing clan or tournament games

    So in summary what I am saying is NOT that you should not play here, but that you should consider yourself very lucky to be able to do so for free and to be asking for more free games is pushing it and in my opinion quite rude and showing ingratitude for what you have received free.
  9. Standard memberTrains44
    Full speed locomotiv
    Account suspended
    Joined
    03 Oct '04
    Moves
    12831
    12 Jan '06 17:05
    Originally posted by rathish
    Iam not a regular subscriber, so i have a limit of 6 games. people, start loosing and they will then stop playing till the time goes out, forbidding me to play more games..... I think RHP should increase the no of games to 10.
    A win is a win!
  10. Standard memberBowmann
    Non-Subscriber
    RHP IQ
    Joined
    17 Mar '05
    Moves
    1345
    12 Jan '06 17:22
    War is war, loser.
  11. Standard memberWulebgr
    Angler
    River City
    Joined
    08 Dec '04
    Moves
    16907
    12 Jan '06 17:40
    Originally posted by rathish
    So, you guys believe that the people who cannot afford to pay should stop playing online chess ????
    I also believe that if you cannot afford the payments and the fuel, you should not drive a Hummer. If you cannot handle the payments on a large house, live in a small one.

    Nothing worth having is free.
  12. Account suspended
    Joined
    29 Dec '05
    Moves
    3887
    13 Jan '06 07:12
    Originally posted by Wulebgr
    I also believe that if you cannot afford the payments and the fuel, you should not drive a Hummer. If you cannot handle the payments on a large house, live in a small one.

    Nothing worth having is free.
    You may think like that......... i dont !!!!
  13. Standard memberskeeter
    515 + 30 days
    Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Mar '03
    Moves
    38202
    13 Jan '06 07:28
    Originally posted by Bowmann
    War is war, loser.
    ..and you still don't know where your parents are, loser.

    skeeter
  14. Joined
    07 Oct '05
    Moves
    28431
    13 Jan '06 13:47
    I thought it was quite funny. No harm done. Maybe he is ugly and does smell bad.
  15. Standard memberWulebgr
    Angler
    River City
    Joined
    08 Dec '04
    Moves
    16907
    13 Jan '06 15:05
    Originally posted by rathish
    You may think like that......... i dont !!!!
    You think everyone should drive Hummers and live in mansions?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree