18 Jun '08 13:37>
Originally posted by no1marauderAgain, this is better than the alternative (destruction of any game moderation). Russ is doing his best considering.
This is getting ridiculous.
P-
Originally posted by no1marauderYes, but RHP isn't a democracy. Russ is the final decision, and he almost gave up. This is better than the alternative and I think it worth waiting and seeing where it goes.
http://www.timeforchess.com/vote/result.php?voteid=2
The community has constantly supported the Game Mod concept.
Originally posted by PhlabibitI think he's saying essentially that anyway when hardly anyone gets banned for six months even though his Game Mod team had identified blatant and obvious cheats in the meantime.
Yes, but RHP isn't a democracy. Russ is the final decision, and he almost gave up. This is better than the alternative and I think it worth waiting and seeing where it goes.
Todays news may have been, "RHP has decided to end game moderation all together. Other sites do not check, as they feel it is impossible to find people are cheating. We gave it a good try, but game moderation is a fruitless endeavor".
P-
Originally posted by no1marauderI don't agree with you, No1.
I think he's saying essentially that anyway when hardly anyone gets banned for six months even though his Game Mod team had identified blatant and obvious cheats in the meantime.
No, it's not a democracy, it's a business which should be responsive to what its customers (who also happen to be their product in this case) desire.
Originally posted by HindsteinWhat a surprise; every post you've made on this issue for the last six months has been "Let's just see what Russ is going to do!" Unsurprisingly the answer has invariably been "Nothing of consequence".
I don't agree with you, No1.
Russ' dissatisfaction with the game moderation concept as it currently appears is clear, and so I think that instead of binning the whole idea, he has spent time considering the alternatives - and as such is staying true to the concept of game moderation that is so important to many of us here and the subject of such huge de y, finding a solution to the problem IS being responsive to the desires of it's customers.
Originally posted by no1marauderIn this case, he has posted that there will be details of a new system within a week. Is that not good enough for you?
What a surprise; every post you've made on this issue for the last six months has been "Let's just see what Russ is going to do!" Unsurprisingly the answer has invariably been "Nothing of consequence".
Originally posted by HindsteinI've heard that song before.
In this case, he has posted that there will be details of a new system within a week. Is that not good enough for you?
Perhaps instead of constantly posting about the last 6 months of relative inaction, you should be looking to the future and celebrating the fact that something is being done about it.
Originally posted by HindsteinThere was already a system that did that. The problem seems to be that the Site Admins stopped doing their job and acting on the recommendations of the Game Mods. Why would I expect the same Site Admins who blocked the enforcement of bannings against those found to be cheaters by the Game Mods to do better on their own esp. when they are not very competent in chess?
Maybe you have, but is this not what you want? - a new system that finally tackles the engine use problem.
Originally posted by no1marauderYou don't need to be competent at chess to see that once the game moderation team was tarnished by accusations of one of it's own, the system became flawed. Even with a new set of volunteers there is no way to guarantee that the same won't happen again.
There was already a system that did that. The problem seems to be that the Site Admins stopped doing their job and acting on the recommendations of the Game Mods. Why would I expect the same Site Admins who blocked the enforcement of bannings against those found to be cheaters by the Game Mods to do better on their own esp. when they are not very competent in chess?
Originally posted by HindsteinIt is standard here for the admin not to reveal the details of his plans.
Besides, who says the admins will be doing this on their own? Last time I looked, the details of the admin's plans were not revealed. Perhaps you shouldn't knock the new system before it is even in place. You don't know that it won't be better.