06 Feb '07 18:16>
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemFischer rules.
"I know what is drawn better than you or your FIDE" -Fischer
Originally posted by cmsMasterGood idea!
The Swiss System seems to encourage draws - especially with the Fritzed out openings, 3-1-0 would work.
Or, similar to Tommy's idea, what if, if a draw is reached, players playoff 2 more games to give better chances for a decisive result - and if one is reached only that result counts.
Originally posted by UndeadNightOrcNo, because anyone taking half an hour over 1. e4 and their opponent half an hour over 1... e5 would be instantly and transparently exposed as game-fixing cheats. Everyone would know, since everyone knows what is a reasonable amount of time to take over a move.
As already mentioned, all the players have to do is take their time. If the max game length is 6 hours and they can sense a short draw coming, they can simply slow down their play and finish well beyond the 1 hour you propose.
Originally posted by TommyCBut nobody is going to be that blatant. They wouldn't need to be. Quickly bash out a few moves of an opening, and then slow down.
No, because anyone taking half an hour over 1. e4 and their opponent half an hour over 1... e5 would be instantly and transparently exposed as game-fixing cheats. Everyone would know, since everyone knows what is a reasonable amount of time to take over a move.
Originally posted by mtthwIs this possibility really such a sticking point?
But nobody is going to be that blatant. They wouldn't need to be. Quickly bash out a few moves of an opening, and then slow down.
Originally posted by !~TONY~!That sounds interesting.
I just looked at this thread, so I don't know if this has been posted yet, but there was a tourney not held all that long ago that used an interesting point system to discourage draws. It penalised white for drawing, and actually made White push for the win in the all games, and the points for scoring wins were actually different for both colors. The tourn ...[text shortened]... and had alot of strong US GM's in it. Someone should find the link, but I have to go to class.
Originally posted by GolubLong-fought battles won't be penalised, will they? If you think my suggestion implies that, you've misunderstood what time is.
TommyC, as I pointed out from the start, you are missing the point of why draws are being made quickly as they do. The players would rather focus their energy on games where it matters rather than butting eachother, wasting their energy, against an equally strong player. If they were to continue playing afterwards, how is that an improvement? Now they have to ...[text shortened]... y-repetition rule instead to achieve the draw. So there are a few reasons against that..
Originally posted by TommyCNO, what this does is encourage people to resign, and not fight for that draw. If you think you have a lost game, it might be best to immediately resign and start on game two so you can even the score ASAP. That said, I assume the clocks just don't change. What if you were behind on time, and behind one game? then your opponent might simply try to blitz you out.
Long-fought battles won't be penalised, will they? If you think my suggestion implies that, you've misunderstood what time is.
Draws after 15 moves won't be penalized either, will they?
Actually, did you even read my post? I assume not - since everyone else has managed to understand it.