Go back
Sub vs Non-Sub Ratings

Sub vs Non-Sub Ratings

Only Chess

R

Edmonton, Alberta

Joined
25 Nov 04
Moves
2101
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

I believe that some subs have a higher rating because they can play more games compared to non-Subs.

I know my rating hasn't stopped rising yet and probably will go up some more but I see some of these sub ratings and their rating is greater then mine but I think we are about the same.

I've played several subs around my rating or higher and either they are over rated or I am under rated.

I just think more games = higher rating.

Agree, disagree and why?

d

Joined
12 Jun 05
Moves
14671
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RahimK
I know my rating hasn't stopped rising yet and probably will go up some more
Not if you never play.

S

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6500
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

if I was a suscriber, I would claim the opisite is true, seeing as I may have 20-100 concurrent games the chances are I will blunder in many.


perhaps your just spending more time each move thinking....

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RahimK
I just think more games = higher rating.

Agree, disagree and why?
(1) If you play more, you reach your true level quicker.
(2) If you play more, you get more practice, your skill will grow and this reflects in your rating.

But it is *not automaticly* so that your rating will rise *only* if you play a lot. There is a lot of players that play a lot but their rating doesn't get better a lot. Or even a bit.

pineapple42

Joined
21 Aug 03
Moves
617748
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RahimK
I believe that some subs have a higher rating because they can play more games compared to non-Subs.

I know my rating hasn't stopped rising yet and probably will go up some more but I see some of these sub ratings and their rating is greater then mine but I think we are about the same.

I've played several subs around my rating or higher and either the ...[text shortened]... or I am under rated.

I just think more games = higher rating.

Agree, disagree and why?
I think it's slightly different from this - how about:

there is one pool of players here - mixed subs & non-subs

I'd suggest there is some sub-grouping within this - some subs play only other subs; some non-subs never/rarely play a sub.

In my own experience, i'd suggest (cue me getting flamed) that non-subs have slightly inflated ratings...

R

Edmonton, Alberta

Joined
25 Nov 04
Moves
2101
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

maybe it just me. No other non-subs think this?

R

Edmonton, Alberta

Joined
25 Nov 04
Moves
2101
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Shinidoki
if I was a suscriber, I would claim the opisite is true, seeing as I may have 20-100 concurrent games the chances are I will blunder in many.


perhaps your just spending more time each move thinking....
Ah yes, always have to see the threat 🙂

SS

Joined
15 Aug 05
Moves
96595
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

c

Joined
02 Feb 06
Moves
8557
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RahimK
I believe that some subs have a higher rating because they can play more games compared to non-Subs.

I know my rating hasn't stopped rising yet and probably will go up some more but I see some of these sub ratings and their rating is greater then mine but I think we are about the same.

I've played several subs around my rating or higher and either the ...[text shortened]... or I am under rated.

I just think more games = higher rating.

Agree, disagree and why?
Nope, my rating takes a hit with the more games I play. Quite simply, more games equals less time, equals more blunders. For this reason I am reducing my game load to around 20. So therefore, I'd say subs do have the advantage IF they can keep their games down to 20.

SS

Joined
15 Aug 05
Moves
96595
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

c

Joined
02 Feb 06
Moves
8557
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sicilian Smaug
I'm trying to reduce mine down to near 0, then start a fresh, only take on 20-30 games and think much longer over each move. I hope to hit 2000 by doing so.
Well I hope to hit 1700 by doing the same. Good luck to you.

m

Joined
25 Sep 04
Moves
1779
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RahimK

I just think more games = higher rating.

Agree, disagree and why?
Not if you don't win......😀

SS

Joined
15 Aug 05
Moves
96595
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

MS

Under Cover

Joined
25 Feb 04
Moves
28912
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

When I was a subscriber I usually had around 30 games at a time, as many as 50 at one point. I definitely missed alot of things due to making rapid moves. I don't think that having mroe games going did anything to make my rating higher.

J

back in business

Joined
25 Aug 04
Moves
1264
Clock
08 Sep 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

who plays corresponde chess anyway? play blitz, and be a true man!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.