31 May '11 13:45>
Originally posted by wormwoodRec'd, because I just could not stop myself!
umm... you're a king's indian player, aren't you? how's that any different? 🙂
Originally posted by greenpawn34This is pdunne's game, which he posted in the KIA thread, but I am reposting it because I think it is the antithesis of a "frigid, impotent, gutless fianchettoed King's Bishops games."
Stop posting these frigid, impotent, gutless fianchettoed King's Bishops games.
Play Chess.[/b]
Originally posted by wormwoodOne difference is that, in the King's Indian, black does not always play ...e5. Another is that when he does, that pawn is immediately under attack, so the Bg7 is doing a useful job: defending it. In the Closed Sicilian, there is no necessity for Black to challenge e4, which will just sit in its place blocking Bg2's path.
umm... you're a king's indian player, aren't you? how's that any different? 🙂
Originally posted by Paul LeggettBut in that game, the e4 pawn is advanced to e5 pretty quickly, clearing the path of the Bg2. So it doesn't really apply to Greenpawn's argument. (On the other hand, Black's Queen Bishop...)
This is pdunne's game, which he posted in the KIA thread, but I am reposting it because I think it is the antithesis of a "frigid, impotent, gutless fianchettoed King's Bishops games."
Originally posted by rob39Nakamura variation. 1. e4 c5 2. Qh5. Clear objective: kill the king. Theory: not a lot, at least not yet. Would I play this? Not on your Nelly. But it satisfies all your requirements.
I need a system to play against the sicilian which is straight forward to understand and has a clear objective and of course dodges all the theory??
Originally posted by greenpawn34As long as the centre is not 'fixed', I don't see why Bg2 and e4 would belong to inconsistent strategies. And that is one of the ideas behind the 'closed' Sicilian, in my opinion.
If you cannot see the difference between Bg2 and Bg7 then all hope is gone.
The White pawn centre dictates I play Bg7.
The KID Bishop is deployed v 1.d4 on g7 because hello d4.
Black has a target. There is a pawn centre to undermine and attack.
Also after 1.d4 where is my King Bishop going to go?
1...d5 and it ends on e7 Big deal.
1...Nf6 an ...[text shortened]... d then play g3 and Bg2.
The howls of discontent can be heard in the Halls of Valhalla.
Originally posted by Shallow Blueit was a rhetorical question. the point is gp is criticizing a structure well known for it's attacking potential. 🙂
One difference is that, in the King's Indian, black does not always play ...e5. Another is that when he does, that pawn is immediately under attack, so the Bg7 is doing a useful job: defending it. In the Closed Sicilian, there is no necessity for Black to challenge e4, which will just sit in its place blocking Bg2's path.
In fact, I can see no reason ...[text shortened]... choice by real world, non-Internet experts, so there must be something to them.
Richard
Originally posted by greenpawn34I laugh at your lazy-eyed e4 'stare' and kick in c5 of course. 🙂 but if there was a reasonable way to play f5 against e4, I'd ditch the dragon in a heartbeat and never look back.
Hi Meph.
You are not seeing the point.
Why adopt that strategy when you have no need to.
You have played 1.e4.
You are staring at your opponent coldy in the eye.
"Give me what you have got...come on...you must have something
against it.....what ever it is me and the boys are kicking your butt."
1....c5
"OH NO! a Sicilian. Quick hide the Bishop on g2 retreat retreat retreat."
Originally posted by greenpawn34No, no. One of the ideas behind the closed Sicilian is an active attack, not a defensive one, against a kingside castle. Only, white plans a pawn storm on the kingside, instead of just piece play. I have had many fun games with a setup like
Hi Meph.
You are not seeing the point.
Why adopt that strategy when you have no need to.
You have played 1.e4.
You are staring at your opponent coldy in the eye.
"Give me what you have got...come on...you must have something
against it.....what ever it is me and the boys are kicking your butt."
1....c5
"OH NO! a Sicilian. Quick hide the Bishop on g2 retreat retreat retreat."
Originally posted by greenpawn34Well, it's pretty obvious that ...Bd7 is just a cog in the wheels.. I don't see why anybody would play that even if they didn't see you're combo. At first glance I would play something like ...Qc7 planning ...Ba6 and Rc8 pointing at that weak c pawn.
Tom Tom my old pal.
That Bishop went to g2 and did nothing for the rest of the game.
White might as well play the Grand Prix Attack by chopping the c6 Knight
with Bb5 and going for f4-f5 without being a piece down on g2.
Hi WW
"....a structure well known for it's attacking potential."
Of course I played it a few times but that g2 Bishop w d here.} 9. Qh6+ Ke8 10. Rg8 {Mate. And the part the Bishop played in that.....?}[/pgn]