Originally posted by robbie carrobie
6...d6 is more testing? we have played an anti Sicilian, no open c-file for black, no
central pawn majority for the ending, no play against the king pawn, hes practically
busted already! In the case of ...d6 and the proposed ...Rb8 and ...b5 with
queenside expansion, we are good to go. After Be3! black must choose his system
and we have cun ...[text shortened]... to name but a few! Even Bobby
(peace be upon him) tried it on his return match against Boris
5... d6 Robbie not 6... d6. Your plans sound great if Black is obliged to follow them, which of course, they are not.
take for example your plan after 5... d6 6.Be3 e6. You say you play 7. Qd2 with the idea of Bh6 exchange etc.
Well no surprise, Black isn't going to just let you complete your idea with ease.
7... Rb8 is the move, Black is going to play Nd4 and advance b5 b4 etc effectively gaining space on the Q-side and meanwhile you are denied your simple exchange as Black has h6 under control. Consider the following line-
8. Nge2 (developing move, preparing to 0-0) Nd4
9. 0-0 b5 (Bxd4 is pointless and Nxd4 drops a piece.)
10. Nd1 b4 (10. b4?! is very interesting but not convincing to me.)
11. Nc1 (f4 is possible I suppose) Ne7 because now Bh6 is met by Bxh6 Qxh6 and white drops a pawn.
While it is laudable to focus on themes and plans in the opening, ignoring concrete analysis and deep research will bring a lot of pain and suffering.
I stick to my original point, the Closed Sicilian is not a good choice for CC- it has enough theory that you aren't really that far removed from Open Sicilians but with less winning chances. It would be better to play the Wing gambit or the Snyder where there there is less theory.