Go back
Undefeated players

Undefeated players

Only Chess

p

Joined
02 Aug 08
Moves
14005
Clock
29 Aug 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

By my count there are 6 undefeated players in the top 300 at RHP at the moment. Also 7 players with only 1 loss.

Is this uncommon and does it mean the number of good players has increased?

greenpawn34

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
43363
Clock
29 Aug 12

No. It means the rest of us have got worse.

thaughbaer
Duckfinder General

223b Baker Street

Joined
25 Apr 06
Moves
33101
Clock
29 Aug 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

We've had topics about Ian Maver before. The second highest guy on the list is this fella...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Kozlov

Seriously would you beat him ?

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
04 Sep 12
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by thaughbaer
We've had topics about Ian Maver before. The second highest guy on the list is this fella...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Kozlov

Seriously would you beat him ?
Des he know how to play chess?

aquatabby

Joined
25 Jul 07
Moves
27922
Clock
04 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Des he know how to play chess?
He could play whatever rules he wanted - I wouldn't argue.

thaughbaer
Duckfinder General

223b Baker Street

Joined
25 Apr 06
Moves
33101
Clock
04 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by aquatabby
He could play whatever rules he wanted - I wouldn't argue.
Good call. Never argue with a man wearing white Speedos.

64squaresofpain
The drunk knight

Stuck on g1

Joined
02 Sep 12
Moves
59562
Clock
12 Sep 12

Undefeated players, yah

I have recently had 2 games (as both black and white) with an undefeated player... ok he's only completed 9 games up to now (all wins), and with the rating of over 1600 i'm thinking yeah, the guy's good.

But it made me think a little. Yes, it's required in the terms and agreements that you are never to use chess engines to "help" you in your games... but, in correspondence games what is to stop people using them? Most of us are here to play chess, but I can't help but feel some of us are here to win no matter what the cost (I, like many i'm sure, personally think it's pointless to have a computer win your games)

Is there a refined way to tell if someone is using a chess engine? I'd like to know

greenpawn34

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
43363
Clock
12 Sep 12

If there was a 100% way to determine an engine user then
CC chess would be a lot more fun and remove doubts.

There is a match up system, where a players moves are run against a
computer to see how high the percentage is.
This must be done over a period of time and with x amount of games.

It's good but is it sound?
Yes when it is very obvious.
Not too sure if you are investigating a known very very good player.

Another method is to read what they say in posts in the chess forum.

Although a lot users have become wise to this and never post nor have a profile.
I would not take this as fact the guy is a user nor the fact they have not yet lost a game.

Some however do.
If it's nothing but an endless stream of total garbage and poor advice and
the player has a grade of say 2200+ then you can have your suspicions.

Why do they do it?

It may not be all about win, win, win.

Suppose you wanted to add some clout in another forum.
For example let us pick at random the Religious Forum.
Why not use a box to get up to say...2200+ .
Then the lads on here (and remember this is a chess site) will think you
know what you are talking about because you have a high grade.
Just a theory.

Ro

Joined
11 Oct 04
Moves
5344
Clock
12 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by greenpawn34
If there was a 100% way to determine an engine user then
CC chess would be a lot more fun and remove doubts.

There is a match up system, where a players moves are run against a
computer to see how high the percentage is.
This must be done over a period of time and with x amount of games.

It's good but is it sound?
Yes when it is very obvious. ...[text shortened]... will think you
know what you are talking about because you have a high grade.
Just a theory.
Nice hypothetical examples.

DJ

Joined
13 Apr 12
Moves
8179
Clock
12 Sep 12

Originally posted by Rank outsider
Nice hypothetical examples.
Let's call this hypotherical user, JRStags

64squaresofpain
The drunk knight

Stuck on g1

Joined
02 Sep 12
Moves
59562
Clock
13 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by greenpawn34

There is a match up system, where a players moves are run against a
computer to see how high the percentage is.
This must be done over a period of time and with x amount of games.

It's good but is it sound?
Yes when it is very obvious.
Not too sure if you are investigating a known very very good player.

Thanks for your reply.

My suspicions over the player in question are merely small... maybe I was just simply outplayed, I mean when it comes to playing chess online i'm still a greenhorn..... greenpawn.

I will keep in mind the possibility of running moves against an engine (I'm looking to invest in one, purely for the sake of analysis of course)

If I ever find a suspiciously high match, then I should perhaps forward my findings to the appropriate person, yes?

Thanks once again... it's just something about players being undefeated bugs me lol
I mean in the games, it just seemed to me like he played the BEST move possible EVERY time....

I hope i'm wrong, and he (she?) was just THAT good...

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
14 Sep 12

Originally posted by greenpawn34
If there was a 100% way to determine an engine user then
CC chess would be a lot more fun and remove doubts.

There is a match up system, where a players moves are run against a
computer to see how high the percentage is.
This must be done over a period of time and with x amount of games.

It's good but is it sound?
Yes when it is very obvious. ...[text shortened]... will think you
know what you are talking about because you have a high grade.
Just a theory.
You think you got a good theory going there don't you, mister smarty pants?

G

Joined
16 Nov 07
Moves
2329
Clock
14 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by thaughbaer
Good call. Never argue with a man wearing white Speedos.
Hear hear!

k
Mr Ring Rusty

Wales

Joined
02 Jun 11
Moves
28718
Clock
15 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by greenpawn34
If there was a 100% way to determine an engine user then
CC chess would be a lot more fun and remove doubts.

There is a match up system, where a players moves are run against a
computer to see how high the percentage is.
This must be done over a period of time and with x amount of games.

It's good but is it sound?
Yes when it is very obvious. ...[text shortened]... will think you
know what you are talking about because you have a high grade.
Just a theory.
;-)

thaughbaer
Duckfinder General

223b Baker Street

Joined
25 Apr 06
Moves
33101
Clock
15 Sep 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
You think you got a good theory going there don't you, mister smarty pants?
Could you clarify whether this is the English or American interpretation of "pants" so that I may visualize your rebuttal correctly.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.