Urusov Gambit as played by woodworm

Urusov Gambit as played by woodworm

Only Chess

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
31 Oct 09
2 edits

hi, when originally looking through wormwoods games i was struck by his use of this
very sound and promising gambit, which i had originally thought was the scotch, it turns
out that it has the wonderful name of Urusov Gambit. white immediately plays
2.Bc4 avoiding a plethora of Ruy Lopez theory and the very solid Petroff defence.

M

Joined
16 Oct 09
Moves
2448
01 Nov 09

Now that is fast development!! Impressive game mister woodworm. Morphy would be proud.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
01 Nov 09

Originally posted by Maxime Ferlatte
Now that is fast development!! Impressive game mister woodworm. Morphy would be proud.
hi, that game was not actually played by woodworm himself, but he has a much faster win, in about ten moves, but i cannot find it. will try to though. 🙂

G

Lagos

Joined
27 Mar 09
Moves
7219
01 Nov 09
1 edit

I too thought it was a scotch variant. He plays it a lot. I think I'll start playing it myself. Ah Woodworm is a brilliant player!!

K

Joined
30 Jun 08
Moves
2848
01 Nov 09

It's a variation of the Bishop's Opening. Black can avoid the gambit and transpose
it into a Two Knights Defense by playing 4...Nc6 instead of 4...Nxe4.
Here's a game with Alekhine handling the opening in a different way by playing
4...Bc5

K

Joined
30 Jun 08
Moves
2848
01 Nov 09

If black does play 4...Nxe4 then it's called the Keidanski Gambit (a variation of the
Urosov Gambit named after Hermann Keidanski). Here's a game with Keidanski
beating Lasker using this opening.

h

Joined
20 Oct 03
Moves
7309
01 Nov 09

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
hi, that game was not actually played by woodworm himself, but he has a much faster win, in about ten moves, but i cannot find it. will try to though. 🙂

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
42492
01 Nov 09
1 edit

Don't leave people in this position. Instructive stuff here.



The final position of the last game shown.

Woody's opponent resigned. Why?

After 12...Nxh7 13.Bxe7 wins the exchange and everyone nods their in agreement.



So suddenly nobody has lost a game when they were the exhange up?

White has swapped two good Bishops for a naff Bishop and a tame Rook
just to win an h-pawn.

Plausible line - look out for 17...d4!!



And what about 12...Kh8?



So it's an OTB game. You are White - you to play. Win it.

Edit1: (woody you are not allowed to comment).

w

Joined
05 Sep 03
Moves
4069
01 Nov 09

Hi greenpawn, nice variant. 🙂
But b2-b4 is hara-kiri, I would play Te3 and I think white is better.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
01 Nov 09

Originally posted by woodworm
Hi greenpawn, nice variant. 🙂
But b2-b4 is hara-kiri, I would play Te3 and I think white is better.
b2-b4 is fur da Katz

e4

Joined
06 May 08
Moves
42492
01 Nov 09

Hi guys.

I have (and we all have) seen a lot worse than b4 on here.
I can just imagine a game going that way.

Just pointing out that leaving a position like on here is no good.
These things should be rung dry of tactcis. They have to be OTB.

No takers yet on the win(s0 after Kh8.

A

Joined
10 Oct 09
Moves
3027
02 Nov 09

Originally posted by greenpawn34
Hi guys.

I have (and we all have) seen a lot worse than b4 on here.
I can just imagine a game going that way.

Just pointing out that leaving a position like on here is no good.
These things should be rung dry of tactcis. They have to be OTB.

No takers yet on the win(s0 after Kh8.
Took me quite a while but I think I found something neat.



13.Rxe6 fxe6 14.Bg6+ Kg8 15.Bxf6 Nxf6 16.Ng5 Qc8 17.Bh7+ Kh8 18.Bf5+ Kg8 19.Bxe6 winning the queen.
Let's hope it holds up to scrutiny.