- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12469
Originally posted by PacifiqueAll I need is your forum posts. They are enough.
You are not in position to judge my intelligence.
Either you're skeeter, which is bad, or you're trying to be skeeter, which is worse. Either way, stop trying to be more offensive than you can manage. It doesn't argue for your position very well.
Richard
Originally posted by Shallow BlueI don't know what you're on about??? Pacifique is obviously nothing like Skeeter.
All I need is your forum posts. They are enough.
Either you're skeeter, which is bad, or you're trying to be skeeter, which is worse. Either way, stop trying to be more offensive than you can manage. It doesn't argue for your position very well.
Richard
Originally posted by Shallow BlueI`m not so foolish to defend charlatans and cheaters, at least.
All I need is your forum posts. They are enough.
Either you're skeeter, which is bad, or you're trying to be skeeter, which is worse. Either way, stop trying to be more offensive than you can manage. It doesn't argue for your position very well.
Richard
[Event "Challenge"]
[Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2012.02.05"]
[Round "?"]
[White "watchyourbackrank"]
[Black "PhySiQ"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "E18"]
[WhiteElo "1917"]
[BlackElo "1962"]
[PlyCount "109"]
[EventDate "2012.??.??"]
{moves analysed for 30 seconds each with Stockfish 1.9.1 engine} 1. d4 e6 2. c4 Nf6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Bb7 5. Bg2 Be7 6. Nc3 O-O
7. O-O Ne4 8. Bd2 f5 9. Qc2 Nxd2 10. Qxd2 Bf6 11. Rad1 d6 12. Rfe1 Nd7 13. e4 {goes out of book after this move}
fxe4 {1st} 14. Nxe4 {1st} h6 {5th} 15. Re2 {NA} Qe7 {1st} 16. Rde1 {1st} Rae8 {
NA} 17. d5 {1st} Be5 {1st} 18. Nxe5 {3rd} Nxe5 {2nd} 19. b3 {3rd} exd5 {1st}
20. Nc3 {1st} Qf7 {3rd} 21. f4 {2nd} d4 {2nd} 22. Nd5 {2nd} d3 {1st} 23. Re3 {
1st} Ng6 {2nd} 24. Qxd3 {2nd} Rxe3 {1st} 25. Qxe3 {1st} Qd7 {4th} 26. Qd3 {1st}
Bxd5 {1st} 27. Bxd5+ {1st} Kh7 {1st} 28. Re6 {NA} Rf6 {1st} 29. Re2 {1st} Kh8 {
1st} 30. Qe4 {1st} a6 {1st} 31. h4 {NA} Qg4 {1st} 32. Kh2 {2nd} Nf8 {2nd} 33.
a4 {NA} c6 {1st} 34. Qf3 {1st} Qxf3 {1st} 35. Bxf3 {1st} g5 {1st} 36. Bxc6 {1st
} gxf4 {1st} 37. gxf4 {1st} Rxf4 {2nd} 38. Kg3 {1st} Rd4 {1st} 39. Re3 {NA} Ng6
{1st} 40. Bb7 {3rd} a5 {1st} 41. h5 {NA} Ne5 {1st} 42. Be4 {1st} Kg7 {1st} 43.
Kf4 {1st} Kf6 {1st} 44. Rg3 {1st} Rd2 {2nd} 45. Rg8 {2nd} Rh2 {1st} 46. Rf8+ {
3rd} Ke7 {1st} 47. Rb8 {1st} Rh4+ {1st} 48. Ke3 {1st} Rh3+ {1st} 49. Kd4 {2nd}
Rxb3 {1st} 50. Rh8 {2nd} Ra3 {3rd} 51. Rxh6 {1st} Rxa4 {1st} 52. Kd5 {1st} Rxc4
{1st} 53. Re6+ {2nd} Kf7 {2nd} 54. Rxd6 {1st} Rc6 {1st} 55. Rxc6 {2nd} 1/2-1/2
PhySiQ matches with Stockfish
Engine 1st choice 71% (30 of 42)
Engine 1st + 2nd choices 88% (37 of 42)
Engine 1st + 2nd + 3rd choices 93% (39 of 42)
Engine 1st + 2nd + 3rd + 4th choices 95% (40 of 42)
Engine 1st + 2nd + 3rd + 4th + 5th choices 98% (41 of 42)
Originally posted by watchyourbackrankThat's very interesting. How do our other games work out Mr. backrank? What are your match rates in those games as well?
[Event "Challenge"]
[Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2012.02.05"]
[Round "?"]
[White "watchyourbackrank"]
[Black "PhySiQ"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "E18"]
[WhiteElo "1917"]
[BlackElo "1962"]
[PlyCount "109"]
[EventDate "2012.??.??"]
{moves analysed for 30 seconds each with Stockfish 1.9.1 engine} 1. d4 e6 2. c4 Nf6 ...[text shortened]... % (40 of 42)
Engine 1st + 2nd + 3rd + 4th + 5th choices 98% (41 of 42)
Interesting data to say the least.
Q
[Event "Challenge"]
[Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2011.10.24"]
[Round "?"]
[White "PhySiQ"]
[Black "watchyourbackrank"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[WhiteElo "1962"]
[BlackElo "1917"]
[PlyCount "80"]
[EventDate "2011.??.??"]
{moves analysed for 30 seconds each with Stockfish 1.9.1 engine} 1. Nf3 g6 2.
g3 Bg7 3. Bg2 Nf6 4. c4 O-O 5. Nc3 d6 6. O-O e5 7. d4 exd4 8. Nxd4 Re8 9. Bg5
h6 {game out of book after this move} 10. Bf4 {1st} Nbd7 {4th} 11. Qc2 {3rd}
Nh5 {1st} 12. Be3 {1st} Ne5 {1st} 13. Qb3 {1st} Ng4 {1st} 14. Nc2 {1st} Nxe3 {
1st} 15. Nxe3 {1st} c6 {2nd} 16. Rad1 {1st} Qc7 {4th} 17. Ne4 {1st} Re6 {2nd}
18. Qd3 {1st} Bf8 {1st} 19. b4 {4th} f5 {1st} 20. Nc3 {1st} Bd7 {5th} 21. b5 {
NA} Rae8 {1st} 22. bxc6 {4th} bxc6 {1st} 23. Rb1 {2nd} Nf6 {2nd} 24. Nc2 {3rd}
Bg7 {4th} 25. Nd4 {1st} R6e7 {1st} 26. Rb3 {3rd} Ng4 {1st} 27. e3 {1st} Ne5 {
4th} 28. Qc2 {1st} Qa5 {2nd} 29. Nce2 {1st} Qa6 {2nd} 30. Nf4 {1st} Kh7 {1st}
31. Rfb1 {NA} Rf7 {4th} 32. Rb7 {1st} Ref8 {4th} 33. h4 {1st} g5 {4th} 34. Rxd7
{2nd} Nxd7 {1st} 35. Nfe6 {2nd} Bxd4 {1st} 36. Nxf8+ {1st} Nxf8 {1st} 37. exd4
{1st} gxh4 {1st} 38. d5 {2nd} c5 {1st} 39. g4 {2nd} Qc8 {2nd} 40. gxf5 {1st}
Nd7 {5th} 1/2-1/2
PhySiQ engine matches
1st engine choice 61% (19 of 31)
1st + 2nd choice 77% (24 of 31)
1st + 2nd + 3rd 87% (27 of 31)
1st + 2nd + 3rd + 4th 94% (29 of 31)
1st + 2nd + 3rd + 4th + 5th 94% (29 of 31)
watchyourbackrank engine matches
1st engine choice 52% (16 of 31)
1st + 2nd choice 71% (22 of 31)
1st + 2nd + 3rd 71% (22 of 31)
1st + 2nd + 3rd + 4th 94% (29 of 31)
1st + 2nd + 3rd + 4th + 5th 100% (31 of 31)
Originally posted by watchyourbackrankI find these correlations pretty meaningless. In a corres game, 90% for strong moves can easily be possible and in no way suspicious. Being 'given' a single variation can make all the difference though. Much more telling is how someone plays; eg humanly converting into a slow won endgame for example or finding a complex but speedy win. Or even opening choice could be a factor.
[Event "Challenge"]
[Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2011.10.24"]
[Round "?"]
[White "PhySiQ"]
[Black "watchyourbackrank"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[WhiteElo "1962"]
[BlackElo "1917"]
[PlyCount "80"]
[EventDate "2011.??.??"]
{moves analysed for 30 seconds each with Stockfish 1.9.1 engine} 1. Nf3 g6 2.
g3 Bg7 3. Bg2 Nf6 4. c4 O-O 5. ...[text shortened]... 94% (29 of 31)
1st + 2nd + 3rd + 4th + 5th 100% (31 of 31)