I take it that position evaluation would be one, and would involve being able to calculate the relative values of various features of the position. eg. 'if i take that pawn with my bishop and he recaptures with the knight', he'll have isolated doubled pawns along the c-file, but i'll lose the advantage of the two bishops - is it worth it in this particular position?' and that sort of thing.
Another i guess would be the much-vaunted 'visualisation', the ability to do calculations several moves long and along various branches.
And another would be to somehow prune out branches that didn't go anywhere, i suppose.
And to spot tactical possibilites both for and against you.
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by KorchThese sound like just a few freak examples of where the rule does not hold up. Strong players will always be quite intelligent - just sometimes it wont manifest itself in a linguistic form, or as being financially successful, but it is still there.
I know stronger players than me and some of them are not intelligent - many weaker chess players are much more intelligent.
Originally posted by TyrannosauruschexNop - it is not just a few freak examples. According to my experience strong chess players are no more intelligent than other people.
These sound like just a few freak examples of where the rule does not hold up. Strong players will always be quite intelligent - just sometimes it wont manifest itself in a linguistic form, or as being financially successful, but it is still there.
Originally posted by KorchGrand masters have transcended humanity, they are no longer people but something in a higher state then we could imagine. International masters are up there on the boarderline too - even the top players on here are probably beginning to feel themselves called to a higher place.
Nop - it is not just a few freak examples. According to my experience strong chess players are no more intelligent than other people.
Originally posted by TyrannosauruschexYou are idealizing strong chess players - they are the same humans as you and I.
Grand masters have transcended humanity, they are no longer people but something in a higher state then we could imagine. International masters are up there on the boarderline too - even the top players on here are probably beginning to feel themselves called to a higher place.
Originally posted by KorchI agree.
I think you are overrating important of intelligence in chess skills. Many strong chess players lack intelligence.
I constantly tell people that Chess ability doesn't have anything to do with Intelligence.
If Chess were related to Intelligence....Kasparov would be the smartest man alive?....no....I'm waaaaaay smarter than Kraparov.