Originally posted by Sam The ShamI didn't say that, I said the IQ-concept isn't a very accurate one. nobody can even really pinpoint what intelligence is, and thus compressing the amount of 'intelligence' a person possesses into a single one-dimensional scalar is completely ludicrous.
Oh well then OK you're right, nobody is smarter or stupider than anyone else, we're all exactly the same, there is no such thing as IQ or differences in mental ability and if there were, they couldn't be measured because all tests are meaningless. Happy now?
1 edit
Originally posted by TyrannosauruschexIn my opinion the people who have mastered anything in narrow sphere deserve most price in that sphere but nothing more.
I have come to the conclusion that life is only long enough for somebody to get good at a few things - so the people who have mastered anything should be the ones deserving of most praise by the others o should deserve of mot price us.
Originally posted by KorchI don't care about your opinion. Your opinion is just that - an opinion.
If you know everything about Fischer`s and think him intelligent then (taking into account your idealizing of GMs) I must said that I have strong opinion about your own "intelligence" 😀
You are idealizing GM`s because you have never met anyone of them. Like you defended Putin in previous thread being so far away from Russia.
[b]For all:
Can someone e ...[text shortened]... y intelligent, but some of them - real freaks.
P.S. But most of them are like you and I[/b]
If you call someone stupid and that person has a genius IQ- I go by the IQ test not your *STUPID* opinion.
Funny how you can't get my point - I keep trying to tell you that just because you disagree with someone's point of view or don't like someone does not make that person stupid.. Isn't that kind of obvious?
Yet you keep posting time and time again that everyone who disagrees with you is stupid. (essentially) .
1 edit
Originally posted by zin23I see that you dont care about opinion of others - you are just keeping repeating your assumptions without arguments as you have done in our previous discussions.
I don't care about your opinion. Your opinion is just that - an opinion.
If you call someone stupid and that person has a genius IQ- I go by the IQ test not your *STUPID* opinion.
Funny how you can't get my point - I keep trying to tell you that just because you disagree with someone's point of view or don't like someone does not make that person stupid. posting time and time again that everyone who disagrees with you is stupid. (essentially) .
So I dont see the point to take part in any kind of discussions with you - you will be ignored now.
Originally posted by KorchKorch says:
I see that you dont care about opinion of others - you are just keeping repeating your assumptions without arguments as you have done in our previous discussions.
So I dont see the point to take part in any kind of discussions with you - you will be ignored now.
For example Shirov is not too intelligent person. I have seen him few times and also I have read his posts in forum of kasparovchess.com (its in Russian) in which he (and also some other GMs posting in that forum) showins total lack of intelligence.
Korch also says:
Also Topalov is not too intelligent judging by his interwievs.
My only assumptions are: Korch cannot determine who is intelligent and who is stupid - so his opinion is worthless.
Korch is just the usual internet troll who judges others based on interviews etc. It is impossible to judge one's IQ based on interviews.
I have seem many trolls debase female interviewers/artists as being 'stupid bimbos' because they are giggling and not being serious. This type of judgment is *worthless*. Your argument is very similar and likewise useless.
As for being ignored - I have been ignored by you throughout the posts. I keep saying that your opinion cannot be used to determine one's intelligence and you keep evading this obvious point or say I am making an assumption.
Based on the topic "core chess skills" you will have to argue by showing me some kind of test/survey that shows very strong chess players don't need to be intelligent. I believe one poster did show such a survey though I think it was a flawed survey.
Instead, you keep pointing out this GM said this/did this == this GM is stupid argument.
SO yes,ignore this post as you have been ignoring every single post I made anyway.
Originally posted by Korchdon't be like those kids in school...the owners of the ball when we were playing football....that when they were getting upset they were taking the ball and going home, leaving all the others without a game 😉
As I`m "the usual internet troll" I`ts my last post in RHP public forums. If someone will need some opinion/advice about chess/chess players you may ask zin23.
P.S. Does anyone still have questions why only few strong RHP players are posting in these forums?
cut the crap and rejoin the party
Originally posted by zin23IQ tests are a load of crap they don't really test your intelligence...fischer was autistic that is why he did good on those bs tests
I don't care about your opinion. Your opinion is just that - an opinion.
If you call someone stupid and that person has a genius IQ- I go by the IQ test not your *STUPID* opinion.
Funny how you can't get my point - I keep trying to tell you that just because you disagree with someone's point of view or don't like someone does not make that person stupid. ...[text shortened]... posting time and time again that everyone who disagrees with you is stupid. (essentially) .