Why did he resign?

Wildfire

Force of Nature

Only Chess

25 Nov 05

Wildfire

Force of Nature

The Bathroom

Joined: 12 May 05
Moves: 31388

25 Nov 05

2 edits

I have no clue why my opponent resigned this game; it seems that a simple pawn push could have solved all his problems...

Game 1460078

Bad wolf

Joined: 23 Jul 05
Moves: 8869

25 Nov 05

Originally posted by Wildfire
I have no clue why my opponent resigned this game; it seems that a simple pawn push could have solved all his problems...

Game 1460078

21. g3 Bxg3
22. fxg3 Qxg3
23. Kh1 Qg2#

Ragnorak

For RHP addons...

tinyurl.com/yssp6g

Joined: 16 Mar 04
Moves: 15013

25 Nov 05

Originally posted by Wildfire
I have no clue why my opponent resigned this game; it seems that a simple pawn push could have solved all his problems...

Game 1460078

21. g3 Rxg3+
22. fxg3 Qxg3+
23. Kh1 Qh2++

But your not having spotted it is a good example of why it can be good to play out positions.

D

Wildfire

Force of Nature

The Bathroom

Joined: 12 May 05
Moves: 31388

25 Nov 05

Originally posted by Ragnorak
21. g3 Rxg3+
22. fxg3 Qxg3+
23. Kh1 Qh2++

But your not having spotted it is a good example of why it can be good to play out positions.

D

There's a good chance that I would have seen it after he had made his move and I had thought about the position for a little while.

aspviper666

Forgotten

Joined: 15 Sep 04
Moves: 4459

26 Nov 05

ragnoraks answer is the most asthetic
21...Bxg3 isnt as pretty

flexmore

Quack Quack Quack !

Chesstralia

Joined: 18 Aug 03
Moves: 54533

26 Nov 05

1 edit

how about mistsplicer's resignations in Tournament 414, was mistsplicer losing?

trallphaz

girls imaginations

Joined: 22 Nov 05
Moves: 183

27 Nov 05

He prolly just needed to go somewhere so he resigned cause he didnt wanna spend time playin no more

zebano

127.0.0.1

Joined: 27 Oct 05
Moves: 158564

28 Nov 05

Originally posted by aspviper666
ragnoraks answer is the most asthetic
21...Bxg3 isnt as pretty

While ragnaraks may be asthetic, I prefer

21. g3 Ng4, mate in 1.

amir1

Behind You!

Joined: 14 Oct 05
Moves: 78

28 Nov 05

1 edit

Originally posted by zebano
While ragnaraks may be asthetic, I prefer

21. g3 Ng4, mate in 1.

The problem is that on 21...Ng4 White can play 22.Rfc1 (or 22.Rfb1) and there is no mate in 1 (although the game is still lost for White).

aspviper666

Forgotten

Joined: 15 Sep 04
Moves: 4459

28 Nov 05

Originally posted by amir1
The problem is that on 21...Ng4 White can play 22.Rfc1 (or 22.Rfb1) and there is no mate in 1 (although the game is still lost for White).

thank you

zebano

127.0.0.1

Joined: 27 Oct 05
Moves: 158564

28 Nov 05

Originally posted by amir1
The problem is that on 21...Ng4 White can play 22.Rfc1 (or 22.Rfb1) and there is no mate in 1 (although the game is still lost for White).

Indeed - How embarassing. I completly kmissed his bishop covering F2 (and eve were in not there that wouldn't be mate in 1).

aspviper666

Forgotten

Joined: 15 Sep 04
Moves: 4459

29 Nov 05

Originally posted by zebano
Indeed - How embarassing. I completly kmissed his bishop covering F2 (and eve were in not there that wouldn't be mate in 1).

dude
it happens
the one thing i know for sure and have learned about chess
is no two players think alike
thats what makes analising games difficult
you can have lines all worked out and then find your opponent has an in between move or a sacrifice or tactical novelty or even a possitional edge from a move you hadnt thought about
thats what makes the game great and all players unique