Hm, good question. Throughout history man has had this desire to be able to dominate and or conquer another by any means possible. Chess gives one the chance to do that in an intellectual level.
I noticed in elementary and high school people who weren't good at chess (kept losing), eventually gave it up, pursuing other means of conquering people.
That's my uneducated take on it 🙂
It is a perfect combonation of intellectual activity--memory, strategy, pattern recognition, imagination, intuition. Also, it is a completely fair game that exposes human nature. There is no random element, so if you lose, you really lose, and if you win, you really win. The chessplayer cannot realistically whine about a string of bad luck--if he makes a bad move he has no one to blame but himself. These are the reasons I love this game. That and it's really fun.
Chess is pretty much a perfect metaphor for any kind of combat- boxing, martial arts, modern warfare, political manipulations... any type of struggle between two powers can be represented as a chess game. So when you sit down at a chessboard, its like a microcosm of a battle between you and an opponent.
Originally posted by c guy1u r not getting those money, because I am
i think you guys all have good points.
For me, part of it is the [attempt at] conqueringother peoples mind, the unexplored depths of opening and mind-game lines, and the $1200 prize at a free entry scholastic tournament I am favored to win this year 😉
Originally posted by Dies IraeI tend to disagree. methafor or not but I do not think that's why some people tend to like it so much. Chess is not a metafor for anything and it is totally meaningless (objectivly) just like any other game.
Chess is pretty much a perfect metaphor for any kind of combat- boxing, martial arts, modern warfare, political manipulations... any type of struggle between two powers can be represented as a chess game. So when you sit down at a chessboard, its like a microcosm of a battle between you and an opponent.
Chess is a laborint that only leads deeper into itself.
I do not have the answer to the question but I think part of it is that it is so comblicated. Then it is also a battle between players. It is a game but unlike many other games it has a small element of luck. If a good player wins over another player the other player wont go and say that he lost only because he was unlycky. Of course overlooking a tactic can happen to everyone but in a sense I feel that chess is a very fair game. I think people thend to like it because it gives them selfsatisfaction.