Originally posted by WulebgrIf the tournaments are only for participants of a girl-only chess camp, obviously not (I don't know if it's common to have participants-only tournaments at chess camps). Otherwise I don't see why not. From what I have seen, chess camps typically seem to be in connection with large tournaments (I can very well be wrong about this; maybe I just don't hear about other chess camps), and the participants of the chess camp can play in the fitting tournament groups.
If these camps hold tournaments, would boys be permitted?
Originally posted by AlphaAlekhineI have no evidence to back this up so take it as you feel. I saw somewhere (television i think) that men are better navigators because in primal times they had to go on hunting expeditions and find their way back. In the same respect, women are better multi-taskers because they had to maintain the "camp" and watch all the children. To me this seems logical. So in my opinion men and women are intellectual equals, but men are better at some things and women are better at others.
I remember reading somewhere that men tend to visualize better in three dimensions. Better with pattern recognition, and goemetrics. Does anyone know of data to back this up? Personally I think that women have the same ability as men, but these aspects of their thought process aren't nurtured when they are young. Despite the rise of women to equal ...[text shortened]... equality, and then continues to segregate themselves, I would call it the height of hypocrisy.
Originally posted by zeppelin xI have many counter examples that women are better in multi tasking.
I have no evidence to back this up so take it as you feel. I saw somewhere (television i think) that men are better navigators because in primal times they had to go on hunting expeditions and find their way back. In the same respect, women are better multi-taskers because they had to maintain the "camp" and watch all the children. To me this seems log ...[text shortened]... men are intellectual equals, but men are better at some things and women are better at others.
I have also many counter examples that men are better navigators.
In chess we are just a bunch of individuals, some are good, some are not so good. Doesn't have anything to do with their gender.
Try the same proposition in racial terms: Whites are better than blacks in chess. Or, Black are better then whites in chess. Pose these statements in public and see what the response will be. I can guess.
Why not adopt the same thougths about gender and chess? That gender doesn't say anything about a individuals skill in chess.
Well, when it comes to the hard sciences like physics, computer studies, engineering, chemistry, etc, male students greatly outnumber female students in colleges and universities specializing in these subjects. I'm sure that females could succeed in these courses if they were motivated. But fact is something is telling them to stay away from them be it media, society, or plain old evolution.
That something could also be what's stopping many girls from wanting to take up chess. I'm sure they have the brain power to excel at the game, they just don't have the interest to pursue it.
It's interesting to note that the video game series "The Sims" has a huge female gamer following. The other genres like action, strategy, adventure are heavily male dominated. So the evolution theory that women brains excel more in the "nurturer" category and that men brains excel more in the "hunter/gatherer" category might have some ring of truth to it... if we were to use video games as an example.
It is not sexism to hold all-girls/all-women events; it is an effort to offer an antidote to the systemic sexism in society that restricts women from engaging in challenging mental pursuits. We have come a long way since the days of the mad woman in the attic (see "The Yellow Wallpaper" also by Gilman), but we have yet a long way to go.[/b]I don't see any evidence that woman have been restricted from pursuing the cerebral game of chess. Not in recent times in the west anyhow. I believe it has to do with interest levels. Susan Polgar and several other females have proven that women and men can compete together. Because more men play chess then the odds are with a male winning tournaments/national/international competitions. We should encourage women to play. But how to market to women and men in a sport that does not enjoy high level sponsorship...
Originally posted by rlanhamLook at any family with boy and girl children. If the boys play chess, ask the parents why the girls don't. You'll find your evidence soon enough.
I don't see any evidence that woman have been restricted from pursuing the cerebral game of chess. Not in recent times in the west anyhow. I believe it has to do with interest levels. Susan Polgar and several other females have proven that women and men can compete together. Because more men play chess then the odds are with a male winning tournaments/n ...[text shortened]... y. But how to market to women and men in a sport that does not enjoy high level sponsorship...
Originally posted by zeppelin xas you can see, in my school chessclub, 20ish boys, no girls.
I do not understand why the chess world needs women only tournaments. I can understand that in a sport like American football men have advantages due to their physical makeup. But what gives men such a substantial advantage in chess to make a women’s league necessary?
P.S. This is not meant to be sexist.
Originally posted by NordlysI'll lay money that if you ask one hundred families, you'll hear dozens of answers that come close, viz., "Sara doesn't like to be the only girl," and "Emily is uncomfortable when boys gawk at her all day."
I bet the answer won't be "the girls decided not to play because there are too few all women tournaments".
Originally posted by WulebgrExactly. That's why I said that chess classes or camps specifically for girls might be a good idea. There also seem to be some schools which introduce chess to all children.
I'll lay money that if you ask one hundred families, you'll hear dozens of answers that come close, viz., "Sara doesn't like to be the only girl," and "Emily is uncomfortable when boys gawk at her all day."
Originally posted by NordlysI've taught all the third and second graders, and am working through the first graders in one school system. Nevertheless, boys outnumber girls almost two to one in the after school club I run.
Exactly. That's why I said that chess classes or camps specifically for girls might be a good idea. There also seem to be some schools which introduce chess to all children.
Originally posted by WulebgrI know it's a repost, but I felt it appropriate to bring it up at just this moment 🙂
I've taught all the third and second graders, and am working through the first graders in one school system. Nevertheless, boys outnumber girls almost two to one in the after school club I run.
http://www.vimeo.com/clip:29520
As a female, my father played a lot with my brother growing up, but the one or two times I played as a child he let me win because I was a girl. As I got older, I found my male friends who played chess were very condescending and down right cruel bordering on nasty whenever I tried to learn. In college (undergrad), the handful of times I tried to play my boyfriends I was crushed and picked on for attempting to play or my brother who enjoyed beating me with moves our father had taught him. "Oh can't you see that, or this...?" I joined this site specifically to learn how to play better without the negativity. Immediately found a great teacher, loads of people to play with, and having a lot of fun overall. As a female playing chess even if you're interested in it, can be a very uphill battle.