1. Joined
    06 Apr '05
    Moves
    1133
    25 May '05 01:091 edit
    let's say that we have 2y+10 over x + 3. We need to add that fraction to 2y+20 over 1/2x + 1.5 . the logical thing to do would be to multiply the second fraction by 2 to get common denominators, right? so we should multiply the top of the second fraction by 2 over the bottom half times 2. but if you multiply something by 2 over 2, isn't that kind of just like multiplying it by one? 2/2= 1...

    2y+ 20 x 2
    -------- --
    1/2x+1.5 2... 2/2 is one, so why do we get a different fraction when multiplying by one?

    what about simplifying? how can you simplify something like 20/4 by dividing it by 2 on each side? 2/2 is one
  2. Standard memberorfeo
    Paralysed analyst
    On a ship of fools
    Joined
    26 May '04
    Moves
    25780
    25 May '05 03:291 edit
    Originally posted by Duck Duck Goose
    let's say that we have 2y+10 over x + 3. We need to add that fraction to 2y+20 over 1/2x + 1.5 . the logical thing to do would be to multiply the second fraction by 2 to get common denominators, right? so we should multiply the ...[text shortened]... y something like 20/4 by dividing it by 2 on each side? 2/2 is one
    The whole POINT of multiplying by, say, 2/2 is that you're not changing the value of something, just the way of writing it. What's paradoxical about that?

    20/4 = 5, and 10/2 = 5, and 5/1 = 5. The whole aim is to write something in the simplest way possible.

    There are no 'sides' to your 20/4 example, by the way, an EQUATION has sides.
  3. Joined
    06 Apr '05
    Moves
    1133
    25 May '05 10:511 edit
    but isn't 2/2 one? that way, when you multiply the fraction by 1, it doesn't change anything
  4. Standard memberorfeo
    Paralysed analyst
    On a ship of fools
    Joined
    26 May '04
    Moves
    25780
    25 May '05 11:021 edit
    Originally posted by Duck Duck Goose
    but isn't 2/2 one? that way, when you multiply the fraction by 1, it doesn't change anything
    EXACTLY! That's what I'm saying. What is your problem with that idea?

    You said in your first post, "you get a different fraction". It's a differently written fraction WITH THE SAME VALUE.

    Try putting any value of x in both of your fractions, you will get exactly the same answer.
  5. SubscriberHegemon
    A Lost Bobby
    London
    Joined
    21 Sep '04
    Moves
    20011
    25 May '05 13:22

    2y+20 2
    --------- x -
    .5x+1.5 2

    = 4y+40
    -------
    x+3

    you are doublying both the numerator and the denominator.

    what's the issue..
  6. Standard memberBowmann
    Non-Subscriber
    RHP IQ
    Joined
    17 Mar '05
    Moves
    1345
    26 May '05 00:35
    What a plonker!
  7. Joined
    17 Jan '05
    Moves
    3242
    30 May '05 07:21
    Haha, at least he asks the question, I spose
  8. Standard membergenius
    Wayward Soul
    Your Blackened Sky
    Joined
    12 Mar '02
    Moves
    15128
    31 May '05 19:11
    yeah-if you don't understand something, ask! not everyone's quite so rude as bowmann. in general, we're a friendly bunch. at times. every now and then. if you're very nice. and bring cookies...but you've gotta leave your cat at the door, okay?
  9. Standard memberTheMaster37
    Kupikupopo!
    Out of my mind
    Joined
    25 Oct '02
    Moves
    20443
    01 Jun '05 08:37
    Yeah, we're friendly...

    You'll agree that your second fraction is 'ugly'. To write is in a simpler form you have to do something to it, without changing the value of the fraction in all points x.

    EG instead of writing 1/(1/2) you simply write 2. What we did here is multiply 1/(1/2) with 1=2/2. The same trick can be done to other fractions as well, like yours for example.

    Multiplying with 1 doesn't do anything, you're right about that. But i CAN change the way we write something. There are many way to write one single fraction. We resort to tricks like this to write them in the most convenient form.
  10. Standard membergenius
    Wayward Soul
    Your Blackened Sky
    Joined
    12 Mar '02
    Moves
    15128
    01 Jun '05 09:25
    Originally posted by TheMaster37
    Yeah, we're friendly...

    You'll agree that your second fraction is 'ugly'. To write is in a simpler form you have to do something to it, without changing the value of the fraction in all points x.

    EG instead of writing 1/(1/2) you simply write 2. What we did here is multiply 1/(1/2) with 1=2/2. The same trick can be done to other fractions as we ...[text shortened]... te one single fraction. We resort to tricks like this to write them in the most convenient form.
    it can be very useful, for instance 2/(2^0.5), i.e. two divided by root two, is actually root two! miltiply by (2^0.5)/(2^0.5),

    2 2^0.5
    ------- x -------
    2^0.5 2^0.5

    =2 x 2^0.5
    --------------
    . 2
    the two's cancel, so your left with 2^0.5. i still find that beautiful...
  11. my head
    Joined
    03 Oct '03
    Moves
    671
    02 Jun '05 16:59
    Originally posted by genius
    it can be very useful, for instance 2/(2^0.5), i.e. two divided by root two, is actually root two! miltiply by (2^0.5)/(2^0.5),

    2 2^0.5
    ------- x -------
    2^0.5 2^0.5

    =2 x 2^0.5
    --------------
    . 2
    the two's cancel, so your left with 2^0.5. i still find that beautiful...
    actualy this example isn't even as complex as that.
    x/(x^.5)=(x^.5)^2*(x^.5)^-1=(x^.5)^(2-1)=(x^.5)^1=x^.5
Back to Top