Go back
If you fold a paper in half fifty times

If you fold a paper in half fifty times

Posers and Puzzles

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TheMaster37
Streching paper...clever.
so her formula, clever byitch for sure!, says it needs to be 1.2Km long
So does that mean if you had 2.4 Km of paper you could do 13 folds?
And therefore no limit? If you had one LIGHTYEAR long paper how many folds could you get, same thickness as TP.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
It is not possible to fold a paper 50 times without cutting it into pieces! Simply impossible.

Try it yourself and you'll quickly understand why.

Take a 1 by 1 meter sheet of paper with a 0.1 millimeter in thickness. The volume of this paper is 100 qubic millimeter. This volume does not eve change.

Fold it once. Now you have 1/2 by 1 meter in si ...[text shortened]... gardless of thickness of the paper or the square size from the beginning.

It's impossible.
what if the paper were 1km x1km with one nanometer in thickness?
in theory, obviously one nanometer thick paper would disinegrate in our hands, but think theoretically...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Has anyone yet considered the length and width of a paper molecule? No way it can get any narrower than that.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Jirakon
Has anyone yet considered the length and width of a paper molecule? No way it can get any narrower than that.
There is something called nanopaper, nanotubes put together in a flat sheet, extremely thin, nanometers thin. I bet you could fold the crap out of that!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Coconut
This was debunked on mythbusters.
The number was debunked on Mythbusters. The principle wasn't. How often you can fold paper depends on how thin it is. Since cellulose fibres only come so thin, and no thinner, you'll never be able to fold a piece of paper 50 times without cheating. Mythbusters got to 11 or 12, I think; using the very thinnest paper possible you might get to 15; but you'll never get to 50.

Richard

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
There is something called nanopaper, nanotubes put together in a flat sheet, extremely thin, nanometers thin. I bet you could fold the crap out of that!
That's not paper, though. That's woven (or felted) nanotubes. If that's called paper, denim is silk - because, hey, it's both woven, so it must be the same stuff, right? Wrong: denim and silk are made from different fibres, and so are paper and nano"paper".

Richard

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

OK, I agree that you couldn't fold a piece of paper 50 times in reality even not considering the gravitational and too close to the sun problems and all that. But in theory, you can fold a piece of paper 50 times. Sure, it might have to be the size of our galaxy, but you could still do it. There is no limit to the number of folds, just the size of the paper required increases exponentially. Does anyone disagree?

Regardless of thickness of the paper.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XZantoth
OK, I agree that you couldn't fold a piece of paper 50 times in reality even not considering the gravitational and too close to the sun problems and all that. But in theory, you can fold a piece of paper 50 times. Sure, it might have to be the size of our galaxy, but you could still do it. There is no limit to the number of folds, just the size of the pa ...[text shortened]... quired increases exponentially. Does anyone disagree?

Regardless of thickness of the paper.
I think the number of possible folds is based on the area/thickness ratio. Possibly the shape of the paper too. The "softness" of the paper probably has something to do with it too.

Didn't that one girl write out these equations?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Shallow Blue
The number was debunked on Mythbusters. The principle wasn't. How often you can fold paper depends on how thin it is. Since cellulose fibres only come so thin, and no thinner, you'll never be able to fold a piece of paper 50 times without cheating. Mythbusters got to 11 or 12, I think; using the very thinnest paper possible you might get to 15; but you'll never get to 50.

Richard
Seems like I read somewhere a hundred years ago that 17 times was the most a piece of paper, no matter how large, could be folded. Of course, that's 70's technology.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
Seems like I read somewhere a hundred years ago that 17 times was the most a piece of paper, no matter how large, could be folded. Of course, that's 70's technology.
Patio furniture can be folded 1000's of times. Paper sucks.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
Seems like I read somewhere a hundred years ago that 17 times was the most a piece of paper, no matter how large, could be folded. Of course, that's 70's technology.
Just watch The Mythbusters episode where they prove there is no limit on how many times you can fold a piece of paper.

It all depends on how big the paper is that you start with and how thick/thin it is.

If I remember, they folded a giant piece that took up an airport hanger about 15 times.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by uzless
Just watch The Mythbusters episode where they prove there is no limit on how many times you can fold a piece of paper.

It all depends on how big the paper is that you start with and how thick/thin it is.

If I remember, they folded a giant piece that took up an airport hanger about 15 times.
They did Not prove that there is No limit. What they did was Bust the myth of the infamous 8th fold. The used a hanger at NASA and folded a paper 12 times. (I already posted this earlier) But as far as the topic subject...it is Impossible to fold a paper to reach the sun. Im not going to say its not possible to fold a paper 50 times (because if you just fold in over, and the change direct, like a krinckle fold, then 50 is nothing) but as far as in Half 50 times....I would pay to see that.

Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
This is absolutely correct. Well done sir!!!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shortcircuit
This is absolutely correct. Well done sir!!!
lol.

People, read the whole thread before posting)

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.