1 edit
Originally posted by Ian68Finally someone puts it together. I kept hinting at the key. I wonder if anyone would have gotten it without my three hints? b, 3 off, e, 1 off, L 4 off, finally someone realized it was just PI! What I wonder is why can't you have a key that just starts at some value in, say the 33 millionth digit of PI and goes on from there, since we have PI defined to a trillion places then we can have at least that many characters and that is a lot of documents!
Believe whatever pleases commoners
Good Job!
Originally posted by sonhouseDoes not pi repeat at the hyper-thousandth level?
Finally someone puts it together. I kept hinting at the key. I wonder if anyone would have gotten it without my three hints? b, 3 off, e, 1 off, L 4 off, finally someone realized it was just PI! What I wonder is why can't you have a key that just starts at some value in, say the 33 millionth digit of PI and goes on from there, since we have PI defined to a ...[text shortened]... aces then we can have at least that many characters and that is a lot of documents!
Good Job!
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/09/hyper_thousand.php
Originally posted by liteswordatlitespeedI think you realize that was a joke, eh. Here is what I am wondering:
Does not pi repeat at the hyper-thousandth level?
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/09/hyper_thousand.php
If you use PI, it works only as long as the key in not known. Now I think an algorithm used to analyse keys could solve this kind of thing pretty quickly and once it was realized it was just PI then the entire message would follow a few microseconds later. I deliberately used PI because the first three letters would show it to be 314, that pattern should be obvious. So what if instead, you started with the 1 billionth digit of PI and went from there? Wouldn't it be harder for an algorithm to pick up on that? Also, there are lots of irrational numbers that have infinite digits, so what if you interspersed in a key, say starting at the 1 billionth digit of PI and every other number of PI would be interspersed with the 4500th digit of the square root of two or some such. Wouldn't that be almost impossible to decipher? Xanthos, if you read this, could you comment?
Originally posted by ChessManCLossSo try it. Of course the fact that the puzzle was already solved might make a differance. Other than that I don't see any connection here. Also, what if the letters were on a wheel, A would be right next to Z, not opposite. In that case Z would be opposite M. H opposite U etc.
the key is this: the letter A would be the oppiste of Z. So if the oppistie of B is Y. Then the answer to C is X. Try using THAT method to find the answer.
But it would be very easy to solve that kind of puzzle because Z would always stand for M, H to U and so forth so E = R would mean R would be E no matter how many times it is used and so can be analyzed with statistics. It would not take very many letters to figure out R is the most common one used and the rest would follow pretty quickly.
My method uses a key that is for all intents and purposes random so E at one point would not be E the second time round so no such statistical analysis would work, at least not simple analysis systems.