29 Jul '08 22:50>
I'm not a chemistry major, so I don't quite understand why the arrangements of the carbons and their neighbors are not tetrahedral in nature, so I am assuming they ARE tetrahedral in nature, which would make all the 6 carbons in the ring identical, although neighboring carbons would lean to opposite side as its neighbors.
Based on this premise, all possible connecting points for the methyl would be identical in form, and the answer would be that there is only one form for it.
However, it would seem that in actuality, there are a few varying distortions of the tetrahedral shape, and that within these slightly altered shapes, some carbons in the ring are distinctly different than others.
So for the chemistry major, the answer would appear to be greater than one. Very interesting.
Based on this premise, all possible connecting points for the methyl would be identical in form, and the answer would be that there is only one form for it.
However, it would seem that in actuality, there are a few varying distortions of the tetrahedral shape, and that within these slightly altered shapes, some carbons in the ring are distinctly different than others.
So for the chemistry major, the answer would appear to be greater than one. Very interesting.