Go back
numbers paradox

numbers paradox

Posers and Puzzles

DDG

Joined
06 Apr 05
Moves
1133
Clock
29 Apr 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

how many times does 3 go into -3?

some of you might say it goes in to it -1 times, but how can you go into something -1 times? you either go into it (1+) or not (0)

B
Non-Subscriber

RHP IQ

Joined
17 Mar 05
Moves
1345
Clock
30 Apr 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

And how many times does 0 go into 0? None at all, or rather a lot?

S

Joined
28 Mar 05
Moves
251
Clock
30 Apr 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

mathematical 0 doesn't excist.

B
Non-Subscriber

RHP IQ

Joined
17 Mar 05
Moves
1345
Clock
30 Apr 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Siebren
mathematical 0 doesn't excist.
I have no apples on my head. Are you saying I'm wrong?

Sicilian Sausage

In your face

Joined
21 Aug 04
Moves
55993
Clock
01 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
I have no apples on my head. Are you saying I'm wrong?
Mathematically, yes. Literally, you do not have any apples on your head. But mathematically you cannot have no number of apples on your head beac=se n0 number cannot exis$t in a d3m0cracy.

DS
I'm A Mighty Pirate™

PaTROLLING the forum

Joined
01 Dec 04
Moves
36332
Clock
01 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Duck Duck Goose
how many times does 3 go into -3?

some of you might say it goes in to it -1 times, but how can you go into something -1 times? you either go into it (1+) or not (0)

Since we're being all literal and mathematical....

Surely it goes in 'once' or 'one time' not -1 times.

-1 is just the factor you use to mutliply 3, not the actual amount of times it goes into it.

B
Non-Subscriber

RHP IQ

Joined
17 Mar 05
Moves
1345
Clock
01 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Daemon Sin
Since we're being all literal and mathematical....

Surely it goes in 'once' or 'one time' not -1 times.

-1 is just the factor you use to mutliply 3, not the actual amount of times it goes into it.
Are you saying that 3 and -3 are equivalent? How so?

B
Non-Subscriber

RHP IQ

Joined
17 Mar 05
Moves
1345
Clock
01 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jimslyp69
Mathematically, yes. Literally, you do not have any apples on your head. But mathematically you cannot have no number of apples on your head beac=se n0 number cannot exis$t in a d3m0cracy.

Perhaps if I take the apple off my head, myself and the entire Universe will cease to exist...

A
Drunken Shogun

on Satan's fork

Joined
22 Feb 04
Moves
35380
Clock
01 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

i think you are looking at it from the wrong perspective. Mathematics in it's entirety is a theory which has no real grasp on reality. The number 1 (the basis for mathematics) doesn't really represent anything real. There is no 1 of anything since there are no 2 things in this universe that are identicle single entities.

B
Non-Subscriber

RHP IQ

Joined
17 Mar 05
Moves
1345
Clock
01 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Asher123
i think you are looking at it from the wrong perspective. Mathematics in it's entirety is a theory which has no real grasp on reality. The number 1 (the basis for mathematics) doesn't really represent anything real. There is no 1 of anything since there are no 2 things in this universe that are identicle single entities.
What an odd thing to say. Mathematics is more about concepts than numbers and numbers themselves provide a language for these concepts.

You sound more like a philosopher than a mathematician.

A
Drunken Shogun

on Satan's fork

Joined
22 Feb 04
Moves
35380
Clock
01 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

i think any good mathemtaician is somewhat of a philosopher as well, just as any good physicist is. We provide a language which best fits our understanding and best allows us to explore the world intelectually, but it's just that - a language. And just as the word 'Chair' is a poor representative of an actual chair (the word chair can be used to describe an infinite number of pieces of furniture) so in mathematics.

B
Non-Subscriber

RHP IQ

Joined
17 Mar 05
Moves
1345
Clock
01 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Asher123
And just as the word 'Chair' is a poor representative of an actual chair (the word chair can be used to describe an infinite number of pieces of furniture) so in mathematics.
You've confirmed my suspicions 😀

M

Joined
12 Mar 03
Moves
44411
Clock
01 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

It depends in which set you are reasoning. But since -3 exists, I would assume you are talking about the set of whole numbers (positive and negative), and -1 would be a good answer. If you were talking real numbers, then there would be an infintie number of answers, and so on ....

B
Non-Subscriber

RHP IQ

Joined
17 Mar 05
Moves
1345
Clock
01 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Mephisto2
It depends in which set you are reasoning. But since -3 exists, I would assume you are talking about the set of whole numbers (positive and negative), and -1 would be a good answer. If you were talking real numbers, then there would be an infintie number of answers, and so on ....
Mathematically, I doubt there are an infinite number of solutions to -3/3.

AThousandYoung
HELP WEREWOLVES!!!

tinyurl.com/yyazm96z

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
27000
Clock
01 May 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Duck Duck Goose
how many times does 3 go into -3?

some of you might say it goes in to it -1 times, but how can you go into something -1 times? you either go into it (1+) or not (0)

How can there be a negative number?

If you're talking about negative numbers, why can't positive numbers go into them negative one times?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.